Farrah Laviolette, MD Farrah Laviolette, MD

Ketamine and Psychedelic-Assisted Therapy Are Coming for Adolescent Psychiatry

Ketamine and Psychedelic-Assisted Therapy in Adolescent Psychiatry: Are We Ready? | Cranbrook Psychiatric Group
For Educational Purposes Only · Emerging Research · Adolescent Psychiatry
Emerging Research · Ethics · Adolescent Psychiatry

Ketamine and Psychedelic-Assisted Therapy Are Coming for Adolescent Psychiatry. Are We Ready?

The early data is genuinely encouraging. The ethical groundwork is not yet finished. Here's an honest, hopeful look at where this field actually stands for young people today.

2019
Year esketamine nasal spray was FDA-approved for adults with treatment-resistant depression
FDA approval history
147
Adolescents in the largest randomized trial to date of esketamine for suicidal depression
Phase 2b trial, ages 12–17
24 hrs
Time to measurable improvement in depressive symptoms after the first esketamine dose
Trial primary endpoint
0
Completed classic psychedelic (psilocybin, MDMA) trials in anyone under 18, as of 2025
Lancet Child & Adolescent Health scoping review

Adult psychiatry is in the middle of a genuine paradigm shift. Ketamine clinics have moved from the margins to the mainstream in less than a decade. Psilocybin and MDMA-assisted therapies are working through late-stage trials and, in some places, regulatory approval. For adults with treatment-resistant depression, PTSD, and suicidal crises, these treatments are producing results that traditional antidepressants — built on the same basic mechanism for sixty years — simply haven't matched.

It is only a matter of time before this wave reaches adolescent psychiatry, and in one important sense, it already has. The honest, forward-looking answer to "are we ready" is: partially — the early evidence is real and promising, but the ethical and regulatory scaffolding built for adults hasn't yet been rebuilt for a population whose brains are still developing and whose consent is legally shared with a parent. That gap is closing. It isn't closed yet.

Emerging Research

What We Actually Know So Far

The most meaningful adolescent data so far concerns ketamine's chemical cousin, esketamine — already FDA-approved for adults — rather than classic psychedelics like psilocybin or MDMA.

2019

Adult Approval Opens the Door

Esketamine nasal spray receives FDA approval for adults with treatment-resistant depression, and later for adults with major depressive disorder and acute suicidal ideation — establishing the regulatory and clinical infrastructure that adolescent research would eventually build on.

2022–2024

The First Large Adolescent Trial

A phase 2b randomized, placebo-controlled trial enrolls 147 adolescents aged 12 to 17 with major depressive disorder who were at imminent risk for suicide, comparing esketamine nasal spray against an active psychoactive placebo, with everyone also receiving hospitalization, standard antidepressants, and psychotherapy.

Result

A Rapid, Measurable Effect

The combined higher doses of esketamine significantly outperformed placebo in reducing depressive symptoms within 24 hours of the first dose — a striking finding given that traditional antidepressants typically take four to six weeks to show any measurable effect at all, a timeline that can be dangerous in an acute suicidal crisis.

Meanwhile

Classic Psychedelics Remain Largely Untested in Minors

A 2025 scoping review of two decades of psychedelic research found that adolescents younger than 18 have been excluded from essentially all modern clinical trials of psilocybin and MDMA-assisted therapy — only a handful of proposed studies exist, and none have been completed or published.

The takeaway is a real distinction worth holding onto: ketamine-based treatment for adolescent depression and suicidality already has meaningful clinical trial data behind it. Classic psychedelic-assisted therapy for adolescents, by contrast, is still almost entirely theoretical — promising by extension from adult data, but not yet studied in this age group in any completed, published way.

This lack of research indicates a critical evidence gap that will impede informed clinical decision-making. — Rajwani et al., scoping review of psychedelic research in adolescents
The Ethical Minefield

Why This Field Can't Just Copy the Adult Playbook

Every reason adult psychedelic research moved carefully — informed consent, screening for risk, integration support — applies with even more force to minors, plus several considerations that are unique to adolescence.

Consent & Assent

Who Is Actually Agreeing to What

A minor can give assent, but legal consent belongs to a parent or guardian — creating a layered decision-making process for a treatment that produces an altered state of consciousness, which is a fundamentally different thing to consent to than a daily pill.

The Developing Brain

Timing Matters Differently in Adolescence

The adolescent brain is still undergoing active synaptic pruning and prefrontal maturation — a period of unusual neuroplasticity that could make these treatments especially powerful, or could carry risks that simply don't exist in a fully matured adult brain. Right now, we don't fully know which.

Vulnerability to Suggestion

The Therapeutic Relationship Carries More Weight

Psychedelic-assisted therapy relies heavily on the guide-patient relationship during an altered state. Adolescents are developmentally more suggestible and more oriented toward pleasing authority figures, raising real questions about influence during vulnerable sessions.

Off-Label Risk

Approval for Adults Doesn't Stay Contained

Once a psychedelic medicine is approved for adults, researchers have noted it will likely be prescribed off-label to adolescents regardless — meaning the field faces a choice between studying this population deliberately now, or having it happen anyway without a solid evidence base.

Why "Wait and See" Isn't Actually the Cautious Option

Many psychiatric medications are already prescribed to adolescents with limited pediatric-specific trial data — this isn't new. Researchers reviewing this field have argued that avoiding adolescent psychedelic research entirely doesn't prevent off-label use; it just means that use happens without the safety data that deliberate research would provide. The genuinely cautious path is careful, ethically constrained research — not indefinite avoidance.

A Forward-Looking View

What Responsible Progress Looks Like

None of this argues for slowing down out of fear. It argues for building the right scaffolding as the field moves forward — which is already starting to happen.

  • Age-appropriate trial design. The 2024 adolescent esketamine trial is a template: active placebo control, hospitalization as a safety net, concurrent evidence-based psychotherapy, and narrow, well-defined criteria for who qualifies.
  • Starting with the highest-need, best-monitored cases. Adolescents at imminent suicide risk — where existing treatments are too slow and the stakes of inaction are highest — represent the most ethically defensible starting point for this research, not broad early access.
  • Separating ketamine from classic psychedelics in the conversation. These are chemically and clinically distinct categories with very different evidence bases in this age group. Treating them as one story risks either overselling classic psychedelics or underselling ketamine's real, trial-backed results.
  • Building consent frameworks made for altered states. Standard consent forms weren't written with dissociative or psychedelic experiences in mind — adolescent-specific protocols need language and processes that actually fit what the treatment involves.
  • Keeping families and long-term follow-up in the picture. Given how new this evidence is, structured long-term monitoring — not just a four-week trial window — will matter enormously for understanding real-world safety in a still-developing brain.

The field is not being reckless, and it's not standing still either. It's threading a genuinely difficult needle: real suffering that current treatments often fail to reach quickly enough, alongside a population that deserves more caution, not less, than the adults these treatments were first tested on.

A Final Word

Cautious Optimism, Held Honestly

The 24-hour response seen in the largest adolescent esketamine trial is worth sitting with. For a teenager in the middle of a suicidal crisis, the difference between relief in a day and relief in six weeks can be the difference that matters most. That's genuinely exciting, and it's a fair reason for hope.

It's also exactly why the ethical work matters as much as the clinical work. Getting this right — for classic psychedelics as much as for ketamine — means building the consent processes, the long-term safety data, and the age-appropriate protocols before this becomes standard practice, not after. Are we ready? Not entirely. But the field is moving toward readiness deliberately, and that, for a population this vulnerable, is exactly how it should happen.

Curious Whether Emerging Treatments Are Right for Your Family?

At Cranbrook Psychiatric Group, we stay current on the evidence behind every treatment we discuss — including where the science is still developing. If your teen is struggling with depression or suicidal thoughts, we can walk you through every option, established and emerging, via telehealth from anywhere in Michigan.

This post is for educational purposes only and does not constitute clinical advice or a treatment recommendation. Ketamine and psychedelic-assisted therapies carry real risks and are not appropriate for every patient. If your child is in crisis or expressing suicidal thoughts, please contact 988 (Suicide & Crisis Lifeline), go to your nearest emergency room, or reach out to a qualified child and adolescent psychiatrist immediately.
Selected References
  1. Rajwani, A. et al. (2025). Clinical Psychedelic Research in Adolescents: A Scoping Review and Overview of Ethical Considerations. The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health.
  2. Effect of Esketamine on Depressive Symptoms in Adolescents With Major Depressive Disorder at Imminent Suicide Risk: A Randomized Psychoactive-Controlled Study (2025). Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry.
  3. The Renaissance of Research on Psychedelics in Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology (2026). Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health.
  4. Ethical Issues With Psychedelic-Assisted Treatments in Psychiatry: A Systematic Scoping Review (2025). Psychological Medicine.
  5. Clinical Research Trials of Psychedelic-Assisted Therapy in Adolescents Aged 16 to 17 Years: Rationale Balanced With Caution (2024). Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.
  6. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Esketamine (Spravato) Prescribing Information and Approval History.
Dr. Farrah Laviolette, MD · Cranbrook Psychiatric Group · Troy, Michigan
Read More
Farrah Laviolette, MD Farrah Laviolette, MD

Should schools teach emotional regulation the same way they teach reading?

Should Schools Teach Emotional Regulation Like They Teach Reading? | Cranbrook Psychiatric Group
For Parents & Educators · Schools · Emotional Development

Should Schools Teach Emotional Regulation the Same Way They Teach Reading? I Think Yes.

Social-emotional learning has become politically charged. Strip away the noise and what's left is a body of evidence most people would recognize as unusually strong — and unusually positive.

FL
Dr. Farrah Laviolette, MD Child & Adolescent Psychiatrist
9 min read

Somewhere in the last several years, "social-emotional learning" turned into a phrase that makes some parents brace for a fight. Depending on which corner of the internet you're in, SEL gets described as either a gentle, obviously good idea or a stealth vehicle for something else entirely. I want to set the politics aside for a moment and ask a narrower, more answerable question: does teaching children to recognize, name, and manage their emotions actually work — in the same measurable way that teaching them to decode words on a page works?

The research says yes, and it says so with a consistency that's genuinely rare in education science. My answer to the headline question is yes — not because I think SEL is a nice-to-have, but because the evidence base behind it now looks a lot like the evidence base behind reading instruction itself: large samples, controlled comparisons, and effects that replicate.

01

Why the Reading Comparison Actually Holds Up

Nobody debates whether a five-year-old needs to be explicitly taught to sound out letters. We accept that reading is a skill — one that develops through structured, repeated instruction, not something a child simply absorbs by being in a room with books. Emotional regulation works the same way developmentally: the brain circuitry involved in naming a feeling, tolerating distress, and choosing a response instead of reacting on impulse matures gradually, and it responds to direct instruction and practice.

The foundational meta-analysis on this topic reviewed 213 school-based SEL programs involving hundreds of thousands of students and found consistent, statistically significant improvements — not just in social skills, but in academic performance itself, with participating students gaining an average of eleven percentile points over peers who didn't receive the instruction. That's not a soft, feel-good number. It's the kind of effect size that would make headlines if it came from a new reading curriculum.

02

What the Evidence Shows

This isn't one study. It's a stack of large, independently conducted meta-analyses spanning more than a decade, and they converge on the same handful of findings.

01Achievement

Academic Achievement Improves, Not Just Behavior

A 2025 meta-analysis of over 24,000 elementary and middle schoolers found SEL programs improved overall academic achievement, including specific gains in reading, math, and science — directly countering the idea that SEL time comes at the cost of academic time.

02All Ages

Effects Hold Across Every Grade Level

Research spanning PreK through 12th grade has found medium-to-large positive effects on social-emotional skills, academic performance, and reduced behavior problems — consistent across age groups rather than limited to early childhood.

03Behavior

Distress and Disruptive Behavior Go Down

Across large-scale reviews, students in SEL programs show significant reductions in emotional distress and externalizing behavior — the disruptive, impulsive behavior that costs instructional time for an entire classroom, not just the individual student.

04Equity

The Effects Aren't Limited by Background

These findings hold across gender, ethnicity, race, and income level — SEL is one of the few school-based interventions with evidence this consistent across demographic groups, rather than only benefiting an already-advantaged subset of students.

05Safety

Students Feel Safer at School

One of the largest recent reviews found the single biggest effect of SEL programming was on students' sense of safety and inclusion at school — a foundational condition for learning anything at all, academic or otherwise.

"Contrary to the common perception that SEL is implemented selectively in schools primarily to promote students' social and emotional development, our large-scale meta-analysis demonstrates that universal school-based SEL programs also improve students' academic achievement."

Cheyeon Ha, Assistant Research Professor, USC Rossier
03

Why This Became Politically Charged Anyway

It's worth being honest about where the controversy actually comes from, because it's rarely the underlying skill-building itself. Pushback tends to center on specific curricular content — how certain programs discuss identity, relationships, or social issues alongside emotional skills — not on whether children benefit from learning to recognize and regulate feelings.

The Contested Part
Curricular Content

A specific program's stance on a contested social topic — this is where genuine, reasonable disagreement lives, and it varies program to program.

The Evidenced Part
Skill-Building Core

Naming feelings, tolerating distress, calming the body, and re-engaging with a task — the mechanism behind nearly every effect size cited above.

That distinction matters because it means the clinical case for emotional regulation instruction doesn't actually depend on resolving the political debate. A school can teach a child to identify escalating frustration, use a breathing technique, and re-engage with a task — the exact mechanism behind most of the effect sizes above — without wading into contested territory at all.

04

What This Looks Like in Practice

The strongest programs share a small set of features, often summarized by researchers as being sequenced, active, focused, and explicit — meaning skills are taught in a logical progression, practiced actively rather than just discussed, given dedicated time, and named directly rather than implied.

1
Naming feelings with specific languageMoving beyond "good" or "bad" to a fuller emotional vocabulary is the entry skill everything else builds on.
2
Practicing a physical calming strategyA specific, rehearsed technique gives a child something concrete to do, rather than an abstract instruction to "calm down."
3
Problem-solving language for conflictStructured steps for navigating disagreement build a skill used in every relationship for the rest of a child's life.
4
Teacher modeling, not just student instructionPrograms that build these skills in teachers too show reduced teacher stress alongside student gains.
5
Consistent, ongoing practiceLike reading fluency, this skill strengthens with repetition over a full year, not a unit covered once.
05

Why This Matters Clinically, Not Just Educationally

From where I sit as a child psychiatrist, this isn't really an education debate at all. Emotional regulation is one of the core skills I work on with young patients who are struggling — and the research consistently shows that this skill develops earlier, faster, and more durably with structured practice than it does by simply waiting for a child to mature into it on their own.

A classroom that spends even a few minutes a day building this skill isn't competing with academic instruction. It's building the underlying capacity — attention, impulse control, distress tolerance — that academic learning actually depends on. That's precisely why the academic achievement gains show up alongside the emotional ones instead of trading off against them.

My Answer, and Why

Should schools teach emotional regulation the same deliberate, structured way they teach reading? I think yes — not as a matter of ideology, but because the evidence supporting it now looks remarkably similar to the evidence supporting reading instruction itself: large samples, replicated effects, and benefits that hold up across the exact populations that most need them. The politically contested parts of SEL are worth debating on their own terms. The core skill of helping a child recognize and manage a feeling isn't one of them — the data on that question closed a while ago.

Want Support Building These Skills at Home or in the Classroom?

At Cranbrook Psychiatric Group, we work with families and schools to build practical, evidence-based emotional regulation skills tailored to a child's age and needs. We see families via telehealth, from anywhere in Michigan.

This post is for educational purposes only and does not constitute clinical advice. If you have concerns about your child's emotional or behavioral development, please reach out to a qualified child and adolescent psychiatrist or mental health professional.
Selected References
  1. Durlak, J.A. et al. (2011). The Impact of Enhancing Students' Social and Emotional Learning: A Meta-Analysis of School-Based Universal Interventions. Child Development, 82(1), 405–432.
  2. Zhao, Y. & Sang, B. (2025). The Effect of Social-Emotional Learning Programs on Elementary and Middle School Students' Academic Achievement: A Meta-Analytic Review. Behavioral Sciences.
  3. Ha, C., McCarthy, M.F., Strambler, M.J., & Cipriano, C. (2025). Disentangling the Effects of Social and Emotional Learning Programs on Student Academic Achievement Across Grades 1–12. Review of Educational Research.
  4. Learning Policy Institute. (2023). Evidence for Social and Emotional Learning in Schools. learningpolicyinstitute.org.
  5. Yale School of Medicine. (2023). Research Finds Social and Emotional Learning Produces Significant Benefits for Students. Child Development.
  6. Oliveira, S. et al. (2021). Impacts of Social and Emotional Learning Interventions for Teachers on Teachers' Outcomes: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis. Frontiers in Psychology.
Read More
Farrah Laviolette, MD Farrah Laviolette, MD

We are pathologizing normal adolescent behavior — and it has consequences.

We Are Pathologizing Normal Adolescent Behavior — And It Has Consequences | For Parents
For Parents · Evidence-Based Guide · Adolescent Development
For Parents · Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · Development

We Are Pathologizing Normal Adolescent Behavior — And It Has Consequences.

Sadness, rebellion, identity confusion, risk-taking. When does ordinary adolescent development become clinical concern — and what happens to kids when we get that line wrong in either direction?

106 → 300+
Number of recognized psychiatric diagnoses in the DSM, 1952 to today
DSM editions, APA
Approximate rise in U.S. ADHD diagnosis rates between 2003 and 2011
Visser et al., JAACAP
80%
Of children with a diagnosable condition still receive no mental health services at all
JAMA Pediatrics, national data
2 wks
Current threshold at which normal grief can technically qualify as a depressive episode
DSM-5 bereavement criteria

Two things are true at once, and most of the public conversation only has room for one of them. Untreated depression, anxiety, and trauma in teenagers are real, common, and under-treated — the evidence on that is not in dispute. And at the same time, a meaningful amount of what gets labeled clinically today is simply what adolescence has always looked like: moodiness, defiance, identity experimentation, and risk-taking that a teenager is developmentally supposed to be doing.

As a child and adolescent psychiatrist, I hold both of these truths daily. My job is not to talk parents out of seeking help — under-recognition remains the far more common failure I see. But part of doing this work responsibly is being honest about the other side of the ledger: what happens when normal development gets a diagnostic label it doesn't need, and why that label is not a neutral, harmless thing to hand a teenager.

Section 01

How the Line Moved

The boundary of what counts as a diagnosable condition has genuinely shifted over time — not because teenagers changed, but because the diagnostic system did. The DSM has grown from roughly 106 recognized diagnoses in its first edition to more than 300 today, with each revision generally lowering the threshold for what qualifies rather than raising it.

Some of these changes were clinically necessary — conditions that were previously invisible or dismissed are now correctly recognized and treated. But researchers and clinicians, including Dr. Allen Frances, who chaired the task force for an earlier DSM edition, have specifically warned that the boundaries of "normal" have narrowed enough that developmentally typical behavior — mood swings, peer conflict, testing boundaries — is now more easily read as a symptom rather than a stage.

A Concrete Example

Earlier diagnostic criteria protected people from a depression diagnosis in the weeks immediately following the death of a loved one, recognizing that grief and clinical depression look similar but are not the same thing. That bereavement exclusion has since been narrowed, meaning grief itself can now technically meet criteria for a depressive disorder within as little as two weeks.

Section 02

Four Forces Pushing the Line

The shift isn't the result of any single cause. It's the accumulation of several separate pressures, each reasonable on its own, that add up to a lower bar for a label.

  • 01

    Broader Diagnostic Criteria

    Each new diagnostic manual has tended to widen the definition of existing conditions, which means behaviors that once fell comfortably within a "normal range" now more easily cross into clinical territory — without the underlying behavior itself having changed.

  • 02

    Academic and Institutional Incentives

    A formal diagnosis can unlock school accommodations, testing extensions, and support services that are otherwise hard to access — which creates a real, practical incentive to pursue a label even when the underlying need might be better described in developmental rather than clinical terms.

  • 03

    Time-Limited Clinical Visits

    A rushed evaluation built around a checklist is more likely to pattern-match a snapshot of behavior to a diagnosis than to sit with the fuller developmental context — family stress, school environment, a recent loss — that might explain the same symptoms without a disorder underneath them.

  • 04

    Cultural Discomfort With Ordinary Distress

    Sadness, anger, and confusion are being treated less as things a teenager moves through and more as problems to be resolved quickly — which pushes both parents and clinicians toward a diagnosis and a treatment plan even when what's called for is patience, support, and time.

We are not getting sicker. We are attributing more to sickness. — Dr. Suzanne O'Sullivan, neurologist and author
Section 03

What Normal Adolescence Actually Looks Like

Adolescence is, by design, a turbulent developmental stage — not a symptom of one. The prefrontal cortex, responsible for impulse control and long-term thinking, isn't fully developed until the mid-twenties, while the emotional and reward centers of the brain mature much earlier. That mismatch is exactly what produces the intensity, moodiness, and risk-taking that define this age — it is neurology working as expected, not evidence that something has gone wrong.

Developmentally Typical

What Adolescence Is Supposed to Include

Mood swings that shift within hours or days. Pulling away from parents while testing new identities and values. Occasional risk-taking tied to social belonging. Sadness after a real loss or disappointment that eases with time and support.

Worth a Clinical Conversation

What Warrants a Closer Look

Mood or withdrawal that persists most days for two or more weeks. A clear, sustained change from a teen's own baseline. Distress or risk-taking that meaningfully impairs school, friendships, or safety across more than one setting.

The distinguishing features clinicians actually rely on are duration, pervasiveness, and impairment — not simply the presence of a behavior. A single hard week is not depression. A sustained, cross-setting change from a teenager's own baseline deserves attention. The behavior can look identical in the moment; what separates a phase from a clinical picture is how long it lasts and how much of the teenager's life it touches.

Section 04

What Over-Labeling Actually Costs a Teenager

A diagnosis is not a neutral piece of paperwork. Research on the ethics of over-pathologizing points to several specific, documented costs when normal development is given a clinical label it doesn't need.

  • Identity foreclosure. A label absorbed during adolescence — a period when identity is actively forming — can become how a teenager defines themselves, narrowing their sense of who they're allowed to become before that identity has even settled.
  • Reduced sense of agency. When ordinary struggle is reframed as a medical condition, teenagers can lose the belief that they are capable of working through hard feelings on their own — a belief that itself builds resilience over time.
  • Unnecessary medication exposure. Every medication carries real side effects and monitoring needs; prescribing for a developmental stage rather than a disorder exposes a teenager to those risks without a matched benefit.
  • Self-stigma. Teenagers internalize labels quickly, sometimes concluding something is fundamentally wrong with them rather than understanding they're moving through a hard, temporary, and entirely survivable stage.
  • Diluted urgency for those who truly need care. When mild, expectable distress and severe, impairing illness are captured by the same label, it becomes harder for schools, insurers, and families to tell which cases need the most urgent response.
Section 05

The Other Side of This, Stated Plainly

None of this is an argument against seeking help. The much larger, better-documented problem remains under-treatment: roughly four in five children with a diagnosable mental health condition still receive no services at all, and the average delay between a young person's first symptoms and their first treatment still runs into years. Caution about over-labeling should never translate into "wait and see" for a teenager who is genuinely struggling.

Holding Both Truths

Being alert to over-pathologizing does not mean dismissing real distress. It means asking better questions before reaching for a label — how long has this lasted, how much of the teenager's life does it touch, and is this a change from who they actually are — rather than either ignoring warning signs or reflexively naming every hard season a disorder.

Section 06

A Framework Parents Can Actually Use

Rather than trying to memorize which specific behaviors are "normal," it's more useful to hold onto the questions clinicians themselves use to separate a developmental stage from a clinical concern.

Duration & Change From Baseline

Has this lasted more than two to four weeks with no real improvement? Is it a clear shift from who your teenager has always been — not just a hard week, but a different person than the one you know?

Pervasiveness & Impairment

Is it showing up in more than one setting — home, school, and with friends? Is it meaningfully getting in the way of daily functioning, or is your teenager still able to enjoy things, connect with people, and manage their responsibilities?

If the answer to several of these is yes, a professional evaluation is a reasonable, non-alarmist next step. If the picture is more situational — tied to a specific event, improving with time, and not bleeding into every part of a teenager's life — it may be exactly what it looks like: adolescence.

A Final Word

What I Actually Want Parents to Take From This

I am not asking you to second-guess a diagnosis your teenager already has, or to talk yourself out of a concern that keeps surfacing. I'm asking for something narrower: hold the diagnostic label loosely until duration, pervasiveness, and impairment actually support it. Adolescence was never designed to be comfortable. Some of what looks like a symptom is simply a teenager doing the work of becoming who they are — and the most protective thing we can offer them is not always a diagnosis. Sometimes it's the patience to let a hard stage be a stage.

If You're Not Sure Which Side of the Line You're On

That uncertainty is exactly what a proper evaluation is for. At Cranbrook Psychiatric Group, we look at the full developmental picture — duration, context, and impairment — before any diagnosis or treatment plan is discussed. We see families via telehealth, from anywhere in Michigan.

This post is for educational purposes only and does not constitute clinical advice or a diagnosis. If you are concerned about your teenager's mental health, please reach out to a qualified child and adolescent psychiatrist or mental health professional — earlier evaluation is almost always better than waiting.
Selected References
  • Frances, A. (2013). Saving Normal: An Insider's Revolt Against Out-of-Control Psychiatric Diagnosis, DSM-5, Big Pharma, and the Medicalization of Ordinary Life. William Morrow.
  • Horwitz, A.V. & Wakefield, J.C. (2007). The Loss of Sadness: How Psychiatry Transformed Normal Sorrow into Depressive Disorder. Oxford University Press.
  • Visser, S.N. et al. (2014). Trends in the Parent-Report of Health Care Provider-Diagnosed ADHD: United States, 2003–2011. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 53(1), 34–46.
  • Suhr, J.A. & Johnson, E.E. (2022). First Do No Harm: Ethical Issues in Pathologizing Normal Variations in Behavior and Functioning. Psychological Injury and Law.
  • Bachmann, C.J. et al. (2017). Overdiagnosis of Mental Disorders in Children and Adolescents in Developed Countries. Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health.
  • Steinberg, L. (2014). Age of Opportunity: Lessons from the New Science of Adolescence. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
  • Whitney, D.G. & Peterson, M.D. (2019). US National and State-Level Prevalence of Mental Health Disorders and Disparities of Mental Health Care Use in Children. JAMA Pediatrics, 173(4), 389–391.
Dr. Farrah Laviolette, MD · Cranbrook Psychiatric Group · Troy, Michigan
Read More
Farrah Laviolette, MD Farrah Laviolette, MD

Instagram didn't cause the teen mental health crisis. But it poured gasoline on a fire that was already burning

Instagram Didn't Cause the Teen Mental Health Crisis. But It Poured Gasoline on a Fire That Was Already Burning.
For Parents & Educators · Evidence-Based Guide · Youth Mental Health
For Parents & Educators · Social Media · Teen Mental Health

Instagram Didn't Cause the Teen Mental Health Crisis. But It Poured Gasoline on a Fire That Was Already Burning.

A clear, evidence-based look at what the research actually shows — and what parents and educators can do about it, starting today.

33%
Rise in teens reporting high depressive symptoms between 2010 and 2015
Twenge et al., Clinical Psych. Science
92%
Of teens owned a smartphone by 2015, up from near zero in 2007
Pew Research Center
Depression rates more than doubled among UK 13–16 year-olds after 2010
Twenge, Generations
67%
Of controlled experiments to date found a causal link between social media use and worse mental health
Haidt & Twenge, research review

Every year or two, a fresh headline declares that social media is destroying a generation of kids — followed, just as reliably, by a rebuttal insisting the science is "just correlation." Both camps are working from real data. Both are also missing the more useful story.

The honest version is this: the fire was already burning before Instagram arrived. Teen loneliness, academic pressure, disrupted sleep, economic anxiety in families, and a documented decline in unsupervised time with friends were all rising well before smartphones became universal. What social media did — and the evidence for this part is genuinely strong — was pour gasoline on that fire at exactly the moment it had already caught. For parents and educators, understanding both halves of that sentence matters more than picking a side.

Section 01

The Fire Was Already Burning

It's tempting to treat 2012 as ground zero for teen mental health — the year smartphone ownership crossed 50% among American adults and social media use among teens began its climb toward near-universal. But several of the underlying pressures on adolescents were building for years before that.

  • 01

    Rising Academic and Achievement Pressure

    College admissions competition, standardized testing, and the "resume-building" model of adolescence intensified steadily from the 1990s onward, well before social media entered the picture.

  • 02

    A Decline in Unsupervised, In-Person Time

    The number of times teens went out with friends without a parent had been trending downward since the 1970s and 80s — a slow, decades-long shift toward more structured, supervised childhoods with fewer unscripted social hours.

  • 03

    Economic Anxiety in the Household

    The 2008 financial crisis left a lasting mark on family stability and household stress in the years immediately preceding the rise in teen depression rates, even though unemployment itself doesn't line up cleanly with the later spike.

  • 04

    Sleep Erosion

    Later school start times colliding with earlier wake requirements, combined with academic workload, had already been quietly cutting into adolescent sleep — a well-established risk factor for depression and anxiety on its own.

  • 05

    An Existing, Slow Rise in Depression

    Some national survey data shows major depressive episodes among adolescents were already climbing gradually between 2005 and 2011 — before the sharpest, steepest part of the increase that followed.

None of this excuses the platforms. It complicates the story in an important way: a generation already carrying more pressure, less unsupervised connection, and less sleep was handed a technology engineered to maximize engagement at exactly the moment they were most vulnerable to it.

Section 02

Then Came the Gasoline

This is the part where the evidence gets harder to wave away. Depressive symptoms among American teens rose roughly a third between 2010 and 2015 in nationally representative surveys, and suicide-related outcomes climbed sharply in the same window — a pattern that tracks closely with the timeline of smartphone and social media adoption. The same pattern shows up in the UK, Canada, and Australia, which helps rule out explanations specific to American politics or schools.

Correlation across countries and time periods is suggestive, not proof. But it's no longer the whole picture. Researchers have also run true experiments — randomly assigning some participants to reduce or pause social media use while others continue as normal, then measuring the difference. Reviews of this experimental literature have found that a clear majority of these controlled studies detect a real, causal effect of social media use on mood and wellbeing, not just a coincidental trend line.

What Correlation Alone Shows

The Pattern Over Time

Teen depression, self-harm, and loneliness all rose sharply starting around 2010–2012, tracking closely with the rise of smartphone ownership and daily social media use — in the U.S. and in several other countries independently.

What Experiments Add

The Causal Piece

When researchers randomly assign teens or young adults to cut back on social media, most controlled studies find measurable improvements in mood and reductions in depressive symptoms within weeks — evidence that the relationship isn't just correlation.

The most useful framing isn't "Instagram caused this" or "Instagram is irrelevant." It's that social media appears to function as an accelerant on pre-existing vulnerability — through sleep displacement, social comparison, cyberbullying, and the replacement of in-person connection with a thinner substitute — landing hardest on kids who were already carrying the most weight.

There is still a lot to be explored, but to say there is no causal evidence that social media causes mental health issues — to that I definitely object. — Alexey Makarin, MIT economist, on platform-introduction research
Section 03

Why This Distinction Actually Matters for Parents

If social media were the sole cause, the fix would be simple: delete the apps, problem solved. If it were irrelevant, worrying about screen time would be a waste of energy better spent elsewhere. Neither is true, and that has real consequences for how you intervene.

The Practical Takeaway

Reducing social media use helps — the experimental evidence supports that. But it works best alongside addressing the underlying fire: protecting sleep, rebuilding in-person time with friends, and paying attention to academic and family stress. Removing the accelerant without addressing what's already burning brings some relief, but not the full picture of recovery.

Section 04

What the Research Says Actually Helps

The evidence base has matured enough to point toward specific, actionable steps — not just "less screen time" as a vague mandate.

  • Protect sleep first. Phones out of the bedroom overnight is one of the most consistently supported interventions — sleep displacement is one of the clearest mechanisms linking late-night social media use to next-day mood.
  • Delay is not the same as ban. Later onset of solo smartphone and social media access is associated with better outcomes than either an outright ban or unrestricted early access — timing matters more than an all-or-nothing rule.
  • Rebuild unsupervised, in-person time. The decline in teens simply hanging out together, unmonitored, is itself a risk factor independent of social media — actively protecting this time is protective on its own.
  • Watch use patterns, not just hours. Passive scrolling and social comparison correlate more strongly with poor mood than active use like messaging friends or creating content — what teens are doing online matters as much as how long.
  • Talk about comparison directly. Naming how curated feeds distort a sense of normal — and asking your teen what they notice about how they feel after certain accounts or apps — builds the kind of media literacy that outlasts any single platform rule.
  • Coordinate with other families and the school. A single household holding the line while every peer has unrestricted access creates social cost for a teen. Group norms — a grade-wide agreement, a school policy — make individual rules easier to sustain.
Section 05

A Quick Guide by Age

What's protective looks different depending on a child's developmental stage.

Elementary (Under 12)

The strongest evidence supports delaying personal smartphone and social media access altogether at this age. A basic phone for contact, if needed, without app-store access, covers most practical needs.

Middle School (12–14)

If access begins here, pair it with clear sleep boundaries, co-viewing or check-ins on what accounts they follow, and open conversation about how specific apps make them feel — not just time limits alone.

High School (15–18)

Shift from control toward coaching — helping teens build their own awareness of use patterns, since autonomy is developmentally appropriate here and rigid restriction can backfire without buy-in.

A Note for Educators

What Schools Can Do

Classrooms see the downstream effects daily — attention fragmented by notifications, comparison-driven social conflict carried in from group chats, and exhaustion from late-night use. Phone-free instructional time, consistent across a school rather than left to individual teachers, has shown measurable benefits for both attention and social dynamics during the school day. Just as importantly, school counselors are often best positioned to notice the compounding pattern — a student under academic pressure, sleeping poorly, and spending hours in comparison-heavy feeds — rather than treating any one factor in isolation.

A Final Word

Neither Panic Nor Dismissal

The most useful response to this evidence isn't panic, and it isn't dismissal either. It's precision. Social media didn't invent teen loneliness, academic pressure, or sleep loss — those pressures were already rising. But it arrived at exactly the moment those pressures peaked, and it was built, deliberately, to hold attention rather than protect wellbeing. Both of those things can be true. Treating the whole fire, not just the gasoline, is what actually helps.

If You're Worried About a Child's Mood, Sleep, or Withdrawal

Screen habits are one piece of a larger picture. If a child's mood, sleep, or social withdrawal has changed and persisted for more than a couple of weeks, that's worth a conversation with a pediatrician, school counselor, or child mental health professional — regardless of how much of it maps neatly onto screen time.

This post is for educational purposes only and does not constitute clinical advice. If you are concerned about a child's mental health, please consult a qualified pediatrician, therapist, or child and adolescent psychiatrist.
Selected References
  • Twenge, J.M., Joiner, T.E., Rogers, M.L., & Martin, G.N. (2018). Increases in Depressive Symptoms, Suicide-Related Outcomes, and Suicide Rates Among U.S. Adolescents After 2010. Clinical Psychological Science.
  • Braghieri, L., Levy, R., & Makarin, A. (2022). Social Media and Mental Health. American Economic Review.
  • Haidt, J. & Twenge, J. (ongoing review). Social Media and Mental Illness: A Collaborative Review. afterbabel.com.
  • Twenge, J.M. (2023). Generations: The Real Differences Between Gen Z, Millennials, Gen X, Boomers, and Silents.
  • Child Mind Institute. Does Social Media Use Cause Depression? childmind.org.
  • Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Social Media Use and Mental Disorders in Adolescents and Young Adults (2025). International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.
Dr. Farrah Laviolette, MD · Cranbrook Psychiatric Group · Troy, Michigan
Read More
Farrah Laviolette, MD Farrah Laviolette, MD

Are We Over-Diagnosing ADHD — Or Under-Supporting Kids?

Are We Over-Diagnosing ADHD — Or Under-Supporting Kids? | Cranbrook Psychiatric Group
Cranbrook Psychiatric Group · Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · Troy, Michigan
For Parents · ADHD · Child Psychiatry

Are We Over-Diagnosing ADHD — Or Under-Supporting Kids?

The usual debate blames pharmaceutical companies or inattentive parents. The evidence points somewhere less comfortable: classrooms, poverty, and trauma that produce symptoms indistinguishable from ADHD.

Higher odds of an ADHD diagnosis in children with 4+ adverse childhood experiences
Brown et al., Academic Pediatrics
9–10%
Of U.S. school-age children currently carry an ADHD diagnosis
CDC, National Health Interview Survey
38%
Of children diagnosed with ADHD have a trauma history that could fully explain their symptoms
Clinical review, trauma & ADHD overlap
More likely a child with ADHD has also experienced a traumatic event
Pediatric trauma-exposure research

Every few months, the same headline resurfaces: ADHD is over-diagnosed. The usual suspects get rounded up — pharmaceutical companies pushing prescriptions, parents looking for a shortcut, teachers too quick to flag a wiggly kid. It's a tidy story. For a meaningful number of children, it's also the wrong one.

As a child and adolescent psychiatrist, I sit with this tension often. What if the real problem isn't that clinicians are too eager to diagnose ADHD — but that we've built classrooms, households, and neighborhoods under enough strain that they produce ADHD-like symptoms in kids who don't have the underlying neurological condition? The diagnosis is often accurate about what a parent or teacher is seeing. It's the "why" that gets missed.

Section 01

The Symptoms Are Real. The Cause Is Where It Gets Complicated.

Inattention, restlessness, trouble following instructions, emotional outbursts — these are the hallmark signs clinicians screen for when evaluating ADHD. They are also, almost exactly, the hallmark signs of a child living with chronic stress, an unmet basic need, or an environment that simply cannot hold their attention in a healthy way.

Large studies following tens of thousands of children have found that kids exposed to adverse experiences — poverty, divorce, neighborhood violence, a parent's substance use — have substantially higher odds of receiving an ADHD diagnosis, and that severity climbs in step with the number of adverse experiences a child has faced.

How It Gets Labeled

What the Referral Says

Can't sit still. Doesn't follow directions. Blurts out. Zones out during instruction. Disrupts the classroom. On paper, this reads as textbook inattentive or hyperactive-impulsive ADHD.

What May Actually Be Happening

What the Child Is Carrying

A nervous system on constant alert from an unsafe home, hunger that hasn't been named, grief with nowhere to go, or a classroom of 28 kids and one exhausted teacher. The behavior is a normal response to an abnormal load.

None of this means hardship simply "causes" ADHD in a direct, linear way. It means the two conditions frequently look identical from the outside — and even experienced clinicians can struggle to tell them apart in a short appointment built around a parent questionnaire and a teacher rating scale, which is often all the diagnostic process actually involves.

Section 02

Five Systemic Forces That Mimic ADHD

When people say "systemic failure," it can sound abstract. In the exam room, it looks specific.

  • 01

    Overcrowded, Under-Resourced Classrooms

    A teacher managing nearly 30 students alone has far less bandwidth to tell apart a genuine attention difference from a child who didn't sleep because of noise or conflict at home. Behavior that would be gently redirected in a smaller, better-staffed room instead gets flagged for evaluation.

  • 02

    Poverty

    Food insecurity, unstable housing, chronic noise, and unpredictable schedules measurably affect a child's ability to concentrate, sit still, and regulate emotion — the exact domains standard ADHD screening tools measure.

  • 03

    Trauma & Chronic Stress

    A child who is hypervigilant because home or the neighborhood isn't safe can look, on a rating scale, exactly like a child who can't sustain attention because of ADHD. Both conditions involve real changes in brain regions tied to attention and emotional regulation, which is part of why they're so easy to conflate.

  • 04

    Bias in Who Gets Referred

    Research has repeatedly found that children of color are more likely to be treated as behavior problems and referred for discipline rather than screened for what's underneath — including the chronic stress of racism and concentrated poverty, both independently linked to more severe ADHD presentations.

  • 05

    Age Within the School Year

    Some of the youngest children in a grade — simply less developmentally mature than older classmates — are diagnosed with ADHD at meaningfully higher rates, suggesting ordinary immaturity is sometimes mistaken for a disorder.

Put these together and the picture sharpens: a diagnostic pipeline that is very good at noticing that a child is struggling, and much less equipped to determine why.

Where there's poverty, there's more trauma — and usually fewer educational resources and more taxed teachers. In populations with a lot of community stress, we consistently see higher rates of ADHD diagnosis. Some of those diagnoses are missing the trauma underneath. — Common finding across pediatric ACEs research
Section 03

This Is Not an Anti-Diagnosis Argument

It's worth being careful here, because this conversation can tip into something harmful: telling parents whose child has "real" ADHD that they're imagining it, or suggesting families should feel guilty for medicating a child. That is not the point, and the evidence doesn't support it either.

ADHD is a well-documented neurodevelopmental condition. For the roughly one in ten school-age children who have it, an accurate diagnosis and appropriate treatment — including medication, when indicated — can be genuinely life-changing.

The Narrower Point

A meaningful subset of children currently carrying an ADHD label may be responding, in an entirely normal way, to abnormal circumstances. When that's true, prescribing a stimulant without addressing the underlying stressor treats the symptom while leaving the cause fully intact.

Clinicians who study this overlap have found that providers may focus on ADHD as the primary diagnosis and overlook a trauma history entirely — which matters, because trauma-informed treatment and ADHD treatment are not interchangeable, and getting it backward can leave a child undertreated for the thing actually driving their symptoms.

Section 04

Why "Lazy Parents and Pill-Happy Doctors" Is Too Easy

Blaming parents or pharmaceutical companies is emotionally satisfying because it locates the problem in individual choices. Systemic explanations are less satisfying because they implicate all of us collectively: underfunded schools, threadbare safety nets, housing instability, and fifteen-minute pediatric visits with no room for real diagnostic work. There's no single villain — which makes it a far harder story to tell, and a far harder problem to fix.

But it's the more accurate story. A parent working two jobs isn't lazy for missing that a child's "hyperactivity" spikes during a custody transition. A teacher flagging a student isn't reaching for pharma-funded talking points — she is managing 27 other kids and doing the best triage she can with the tools in front of her. The failure, where one exists, usually sits upstream of any individual person's decision.

Section 05

What Actually Helps

If the goal is getting kids the right support instead of the fastest label, a few shifts make a measurable difference.

  • Make trauma-informed evaluation standard practice, not an afterthought — clinical guidance now recommends considering trauma whenever a child presents with attention or behavioral concerns.
  • Push for smaller class sizes and more support staff, so environment-driven behavior gets noticed and addressed before it escalates to a diagnostic referral.
  • Screen for adversity, not just symptoms — asking about housing stability, food access, and family stress alongside standard rating scales gives a fuller picture.
  • Invest in the unglamorous systemic fixes — affordable housing, parental mental health care, school funding — that quietly reduce the chronic stress driving a share of these symptoms in the first place.
A Final Word

The Real Question

"Are we over-diagnosing ADHD?" assumes the diagnosis itself is the problem. A more honest question might be: are we accurately identifying what's going on with kids who are struggling — or defaulting to the one label our systems are built to recognize and treat, because it's the only tool close at hand?

For a lot of kids, the diagnosis is right. For others, it may be the closest available word for something that isn't a disorder in the child at all — it's a mismatch between what a child needs and what the systems around them are able to give.

If You're Not Sure What You're Seeing in Your Child

At Cranbrook Psychiatric Group, evaluation always starts with the full picture — developmental history, home and school environment, and any sources of stress or adversity — before any diagnosis or treatment plan is discussed. We see families via telehealth, from anywhere in Michigan.

This post is for educational purposes only and does not constitute clinical advice or a diagnosis. If you have concerns about your child's attention, behavior, or wellbeing, please reach out to a qualified child and adolescent psychiatrist or mental health professional.
Selected References
  • Brown, N.M. et al. Associations Between Adverse Childhood Experiences and ADHD Diagnosis and Severity. Academic Pediatrics.
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Data and Statistics on ADHD. CDC.gov.
  • American Academy of Pediatrics. Clinical Practice Guideline for the Diagnosis, Evaluation, and Treatment of ADHD in Children and Adolescents. Pediatrics.
  • Child Mind Institute. Is It ADHD or Trauma? Understanding the Differences. childmind.org.
  • National Survey of Children's Health data on family stressors and ADHD diagnosis, Children's Hospital at Montefiore.
Cranbrook Psychiatric Group · Troy, Michigan · Telehealth Available Statewide
Read More
Farrah Laviolette, MD Farrah Laviolette, MD

How to Know If Your Teen Is Depressed

How to Know If Your Teen Is Depressed | Cranbrook Psychiatric Group
Depressed?
For Parents · Teen Mental Health · Cranbrook Psychiatric Group
Child & Adolescent Psychiatry

How to Know
If Your Teen
Is Depressed

Depression in teenagers rarely looks the way we expect. This guide helps parents see past the surface — and recognize when their child needs more than patience.

Dr. Farrah Laviolette, MD Child & Adolescent Psychiatrist · Cranbrook Psychiatric Group · Troy, Michigan
10 min read
Depression affects 1 in 5 teens Most cases go unrecognized for over a year 80% respond to treatment Telehealth available

Teenage depression does not always look like sadness. It looks like sleeping until noon and still being exhausted. It looks like a teenager who stopped caring about things they used to love. It looks like anger, irritability, and shutting the door. It looks like "I'm fine" — said in a way that means anything but.

As a child and adolescent psychiatrist, I spend a significant part of my work helping parents understand what they are actually seeing in their teenagers — because depression in adolescents is one of the most commonly missed and most commonly misattributed conditions in my clinical experience. It gets called laziness. It gets called attitude. It gets called "just being a teenager." And while it waits to be recognized, it compounds.

This post is my attempt to give you the clearest possible picture of what adolescent depression actually looks like — and what to do when you recognize it.

1 in 5
Adolescents will experience a major depressive episode before the age of 18 — making depression one of the leading causes of disability in young people.
Merikangas et al., Archives of General Psychiatry, 2010
14 mo
Average time between when a teenager first becomes depressed and when they receive any treatment — over a year of unnecessary suffering.
Wang et al., Archives of General Psychiatry, 2005
80%
Of adolescents with depression respond positively to treatment — therapy, medication, or combined — when they finally receive it.
NIMH, 2023; Treatment for Adolescents with Depression Study (TADS)
Section 01

Why Teen Depression Is So Often Missed

Adult depression and adolescent depression share a diagnostic foundation — but they present very differently. In adults, depression tends to look like sadness, withdrawal, and slowed activity. In teenagers, the most prominent features are often irritability, anger, and restlessness rather than visible sadness. A teenager who seems constantly annoyed, short-tempered, and difficult to reach may not be going through a phase. They may be depressed.

There are also developmental reasons why depression hides in adolescence. Teenagers are neurologically primed to seek independence, conceal vulnerability, and maintain social image — all of which create powerful incentives to suppress or deny emotional pain. A teenager who is struggling desperately may perform fine at school, maintain friendships superficially, and tell every adult in their life that everything is okay.

How Adults See It

What Parents Often Attribute It To

Laziness, teenage attitude, social media, poor sleep habits, academic stress, friendship drama, or "just a phase." All of these can be real contributors — but when multiple signs cluster together and persist over weeks, the picture is clinical, not developmental.

What It Actually Is

What the Teenager Is Experiencing

A neurobiological condition involving disrupted serotonin, dopamine, and norepinephrine regulation — affecting mood, energy, motivation, cognition, sleep, and appetite simultaneously. It is not a choice, a character flaw, or a failure of willpower. It is a medical condition that responds to treatment.

Section 02

12 Signs Your Teen May Be Depressed

The following signs are drawn from DSM-5-TR diagnostic criteria, clinical research, and the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry practice parameters for adolescent depression. No single sign confirms depression — but when multiple signs are present for two or more weeks and represent a change from your teenager's baseline, a clinical evaluation is warranted.

01
Persistent Sadness, Emptiness, or Tearfulness A pervasive low mood most of the day, nearly every day — though in teens this may manifest as emotional numbness or a sense of "not feeling anything" rather than visible crying. In adolescents, irritability may substitute for sadness as the primary mood disturbance.
02
Loss of Interest in Things They Used to Love A teenager who quits a sport they once loved, stops making music, loses interest in friends, or withdraws from hobbies without explanation may be experiencing anhedonia — the clinical inability to experience pleasure. Anhedonia is one of the two core criteria for major depressive disorder.
03
Significant Changes in Sleep Sleeping far more than usual — particularly sleeping through alarms, napping constantly, or being unable to get out of bed — or the opposite: lying awake for hours, waking repeatedly, or experiencing insomnia. Sleep disturbance is present in over 90% of depressed adolescents.
04
Fatigue and Low Energy A teenager who seems chronically exhausted regardless of how much they sleep, moves slowly, speaks slowly, or struggles to initiate basic tasks like showering or doing homework — not from laziness but from a physiological depletion of energy.
05
Changes in Appetite or Weight Significant decrease in appetite — forgetting to eat, pushing food away, losing weight — or the opposite: emotional eating, food preoccupation, or significant weight gain. Either direction can reflect depression.
06
Difficulty Concentrating or Making Decisions Complaints of a "foggy" brain, inability to focus, forgetting things they should know, or being unable to make even minor decisions. Often misidentified as ADHD — though the two conditions frequently co-occur. Cognitive symptoms of depression significantly impair academic performance.
07
Irritability, Anger, or Explosive Outbursts In adolescents, depression frequently manifests as irritability rather than sadness — short fuses, disproportionate emotional reactions, frequent conflict, snapping at family members, or a persistent sense of being easily overwhelmed or frustrated. This is the most commonly missed presentation of teen depression in parents and teachers.
08
Withdrawal From Family and Friends Increasingly isolating — spending most of their time alone in their room, avoiding family meals and activities, responding minimally to messages, and losing interest in social relationships that previously mattered to them.
09
Negative Self-Talk and Worthlessness Statements like "I'm stupid," "Nobody likes me," "I can't do anything right," or "I'm a burden" — expressed repeatedly, across contexts, and beyond normal self-critical moments. Depressive cognitions feel absolutely true to the person experiencing them.
10
Declining Academic Performance A noticeable drop in grades, increasing school absences, inability to complete assignments, or growing indifference to academic outcomes in a student who previously cared about their performance. School performance is a sensitive early indicator of emerging depression in adolescents.
11
Physical Complaints Without Medical Cause Frequent headaches, stomachaches, back pain, or other somatic complaints that have been medically evaluated and cleared. Depression has real physical symptoms — it is not "all in their head," but it may be expressed through the body.
12
Thoughts of Death, Self-Harm, or Suicide Any mention — direct or indirect, joking or serious — of wanting to die, not wanting to be alive, or self-harm. This includes social media posts, song choices, and statements made in passing. Always take this seriously. Always ask directly. If your teen expresses suicidal ideation, seek emergency evaluation or call 988 immediately.

The teenager who slams their door and says "leave me alone" may be the teenager who most needs someone to stay. Depression speaks in distances — and the parent who keeps showing up, quietly, consistently, is often doing more than they know.

— Dr. Farrah Laviolette, MD · Cranbrook Psychiatric Group
Section 03

Depression vs. Normal Teen Behavior: How to Tell the Difference

One of the most common things I hear from parents is: "But isn't this just normal teenager stuff?" It is a fair question — and the honest answer is: sometimes. Adolescence is genuinely turbulent. But there are specific qualities that distinguish clinical depression from normal developmental struggles.

Key Distinctions — Depression vs. Normal Development
  • Duration: Normal mood dips resolve within days. Depression persists for two weeks or more, most of the day, most days
  • Pervasiveness: Normal struggles are often situational. Depression affects functioning across all settings — home, school, friendships, and self-care
  • Change from baseline: The most important signal is a shift from who your child was. A previously engaged, social teenager who becomes isolated and indifferent is showing you something clinical
  • Intensity: Normal sadness or frustration is proportional. Depressive episodes feel overwhelming, inescapable, and hopeless to the person experiencing them
  • Impairment: Normal teen struggles don't typically derail school, friendships, and self-care simultaneously. When multiple domains are affected, the picture is clinical
  • Anhedonia: Loss of pleasure in previously enjoyed activities is not typical teenage behavior — it is a hallmark symptom of depression
Section 04

How to Talk to Your Teen About Depression

Many parents worry that naming what they see will make things worse, or that their teenager will shut down the conversation entirely. These are understandable fears — but avoidance costs more than the discomfort of a hard conversation. Here is how to approach it.

Principles for the Conversation
  • Choose a calm, private moment — not in the middle of a conflict or immediately after an outburst
  • Lead with observation, not accusation: "I've noticed you've seemed really tired and disconnected lately, and I'm worried about you"
  • Ask open questions: "How have you been feeling lately — like, really feeling?" rather than "Are you depressed?"
  • Resist the urge to immediately problem-solve, minimize, or reassure — just listen first
  • If they shut down, say: "You don't have to talk now. I just want you to know I see you, and I'm not going anywhere."
  • Ask directly about suicidal thoughts if you are worried — this does not plant the idea, and it may open a critical conversation
  • Stay regulated yourself — your teen is watching your reaction to gauge whether it's safe to be honest

What to say — in their language:

For a Younger Teen (13–15)

"I've noticed you don't seem like yourself lately. You seem tired all the time, and you've stopped doing things you used to love. I'm not here to get you in trouble — I'm here because I love you and I want to help. Can we just talk for a few minutes?"

For an Older Teen (16–18)

"I want to be straight with you. I've been watching you for the past few weeks, and I'm genuinely worried. What I'm seeing — the exhaustion, the withdrawal, the not caring about things — that's not just stress. I'd like to get you an appointment with someone who specializes in this. Not to label you. Just to understand what's going on."

Section 05

Risk Factors That Increase Vulnerability

Certain factors meaningfully elevate a teenager's risk for depression. Their presence doesn't guarantee depression — but it should lower the threshold at which you seek professional evaluation.

Clinical Risk Factors

Biological & Medical

Family history of depression or bipolar disorder (heritability of depression is estimated at 40–70%) · Prior depressive episode · Co-occurring anxiety disorder · Chronic illness or pain · History of trauma or abuse · Female sex assigned at birth (depression is twice as common in adolescent girls after puberty)

Environmental Risk Factors

Social & Situational

Bullying or social isolation · Significant loss (death, divorce, breakup, move) · Academic failure or pressure · LGBTQ+ identity without family support · Exposure to parental mental illness or substance use · Social media use associated with social comparison and cyberbullying · Lack of strong peer connections

Section 06

What Treatment Looks Like — and Why It Works

Adolescent depression is highly treatable. The landmark TADS study — the Treatment for Adolescents with Depression Study — found that the combination of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and medication (fluoxetine) produced response rates of approximately 71%, compared to 61% for medication alone and 43% for therapy alone. Combined treatment is typically the most effective approach for moderate-to-severe depression.

Evidence-Based Treatment Options
  • Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT): The gold-standard psychotherapy for adolescent depression — teaches identification and restructuring of depressive thought patterns
  • Interpersonal Therapy for Adolescents (IPT-A): Specifically developed for teens; focuses on relationship patterns and role transitions that contribute to depression
  • Medication (SSRIs): Fluoxetine (Prozac) is FDA-approved for adolescent depression; escitalopram is also approved; typically combined with therapy for best outcomes
  • Combined treatment: CBT plus medication produces the highest response rates in moderate-to-severe adolescent depression (TADS, 2004)
  • Family involvement: Including parents in treatment — through family therapy or parent coaching — significantly improves outcomes, particularly in younger adolescents
  • School coordination: A 504 Plan or IEP can provide academic accommodations that reduce pressure while your teen recovers
Section 07

When to Seek Help — and How Urgently

Seek Emergency Care Immediately If Your Teen:
  • Expresses suicidal intent or has a plan for self-harm
  • Has made a suicide attempt or engaged in serious self-harm
  • Is psychotic, severely agitated, or unable to be safely managed at home
  • Has stopped eating, sleeping, or functioning entirely
Schedule a Psychiatric Evaluation Within 1–2 Weeks If Your Teen:
  • Has shown 4 or more signs from the list above for 2+ weeks
  • Has made passive statements about death or not wanting to be alive
  • Has a prior depressive episode and is showing early signs of recurrence
  • Is significantly impaired in school, relationships, or self-care
  • Has a family history of depression and is showing behavioral changes
  • Your instinct is telling you something is genuinely wrong

This post is for educational purposes only and does not constitute clinical advice or a diagnosis. If you are concerned about your teenager's mental health, please reach out to a qualified child and adolescent psychiatrist or mental health professional.

At Cranbrook Psychiatric Group, Dr. Farrah Laviolette, MD provides comprehensive psychiatric evaluations and ongoing treatment for adolescents with depression, anxiety, and other mood disorders. We see families via telehealth from the comfort of their own home. If you recognized your teenager in this post, please don't wait — reach out to our office and let us help.

988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline: Call or text 988  ·  Crisis Text Line: Text HOME to 741741

Selected References
  • Merikangas, K.R. et al. (2010). Lifetime prevalence of mental disorders in U.S. adolescents. Archives of General Psychiatry, 67(10), 1002–1014.
  • Wang, P.S. et al. (2005). Failure and delay in initial treatment contact after first onset of mental disorders. Archives of General Psychiatry, 62(6), 603–613.
  • March, J. et al. (2004). Fluoxetine, cognitive-behavioral therapy, and their combination for adolescents with depression: TADS randomized controlled trial. JAMA, 292(7), 807–820.
  • American Psychiatric Association. (2022). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th ed., text rev.). DSM-5-TR.
  • American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. (2018). Practice parameter for the assessment and treatment of children and adolescents with depressive disorders. AACAP.
  • Birmaher, B. et al. (2007). Clinical presentation and course of depression in youth. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 46(3), 267–283.
  • National Institute of Mental Health. (2023). Major depression in adolescents. nimh.nih.gov.
  • Sullivan, P.F. et al. (2000). Genetic epidemiology of major depression. American Journal of Psychiatry, 157(10), 1552–1562.
Read More
Farrah Laviolette, MD Farrah Laviolette, MD

504 Plan vs. IEP: What's the Difference?

504 Plan vs. IEP: What's the Difference? | Cranbrook Psychiatric Group
Cranbrook  Psychiatric Group
Resources / For Parents / 504 vs. IEP
For Parents School Accommodations · Child Psychiatry · Educational Advocacy

504 Plan vs.
IEP: What's
the Difference?

A plain-language guide for parents navigating school accommodations for children with ADHD, anxiety, learning differences, and other psychiatric conditions — written by a child psychiatrist who helps families advocate for their kids every day.

Written By Dr. Farrah Laviolette, MD Child & Adolescent Psychiatrist
Cranbrook Psychiatric Group
Troy, Michigan
504
Section 504 Plan
Rehabilitation Act of 1973
IEP
Individualized Education Program
IDEA — Individuals with Disabilities Education Act

If your child has been diagnosed with ADHD, anxiety, a learning disability, or another condition that affects their school performance, you've likely heard the terms "504 Plan" and "IEP." You may have nodded along in a school meeting while privately wondering: what is the actual difference, and which one does my child need? This post is written to answer exactly that.

As a child psychiatrist, I write letters and documentation supporting families in obtaining both 504 Plans and IEPs regularly. I also sit in on school meetings, consult with educators, and watch parents navigate a system that can feel opaque and overwhelming. My goal here is to make this genuinely clear — so that you can walk into your next school meeting informed, confident, and ready to advocate effectively.

7.3M
Students in the U.S. receive special education services under an IEP — approximately 15% of all public school students.
National Center for Education Statistics, 2023
4M+
Additional students are served under 504 Plans, including many with ADHD, anxiety, and physical health conditions.
U.S. Department of Education, Office for Civil Rights, 2022
64%
Of students with disabilities spend 80% or more of their school day in general education classrooms — most supported by 504s or IEPs.
NCES, Digest of Education Statistics, 2023
1 in 5
Children has a learning or attention challenge — yet many never receive any formal school accommodation despite significant need.
National Center for Learning Disabilities, 2023

The Fundamental Difference

Both 504 Plans and IEPs are legal documents that entitle students with disabilities to receive support in school. But they come from different federal laws, serve different purposes, and offer different levels of support. Understanding that distinction is the foundation of everything else.

Section 504 · Civil Rights Law

The 504 Plan

  • Governed by Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 — a civil rights law, not an education law
  • Prohibits discrimination against individuals with disabilities in programs receiving federal funding
  • Provides accommodations that allow equal access to the general education curriculum
  • Does not provide specialized instruction or services
  • Broader eligibility — any physical or mental impairment that substantially limits a major life activity
  • Less formal process; no federally mandated timelines for evaluation or plan development
  • School district bears the cost of any services provided
IDEA · Special Education Law

The IEP

  • Governed by the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) — a federal education law
  • Entitles eligible students to a Free Appropriate Public Education (FAPE) in the Least Restrictive Environment (LRE)
  • Provides both accommodations and specialized instruction tailored to the student's unique needs
  • Requires specific eligibility under one of 13 disability categories defined by IDEA
  • More formal process with strict federally mandated timelines and procedural safeguards
  • Includes measurable annual goals, progress monitoring, and required team meetings
  • May include pull-out services, resource rooms, speech therapy, OT, counseling, and more

Side-by-Side Comparison

Use this table to quickly compare the key elements of each plan. This is the reference I wish every parent had before their first school meeting.

504 Plan
IEP
Legal Basis
Section 504, Rehabilitation Act of 1973
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA)
Purpose
Ensure equal access to general education through accommodations
Provide specialized instruction and services for meaningful educational benefit
Eligibility
Any physical or mental impairment that substantially limits a major life activity (learning, concentrating, communicating, sleeping, etc.)
Must qualify under one of 13 specific IDEA categories: SLD, OHI, autism, emotional disturbance, speech/language, intellectual disability, and others
What It Provides
Accommodations only (extended time, preferential seating, reduced assignments, sensory breaks, etc.)
Accommodations plus specialized instruction, related services (speech, OT, counseling), modified curriculum, and more
Annual Goals
Not required — focuses on access, not skill-building targets
Required — measurable annual goals in all areas of need, with progress monitoring
Team Meeting
Not federally mandated, though best practice; typically involves parents, teachers, and school counselor
Federally required IEP Team meeting including parents, general ed teacher, special ed teacher, school administrator, and the student (when appropriate)
Review Timeline
Typically reviewed annually; no strict federal timeline
Reviewed at least annually; full reevaluation required every 3 years
Parental Rights
Fewer formal procedural safeguards; parents can request meetings and review records
Extensive procedural safeguards — right to prior written notice, independent evaluation, mediation, and due process hearing
Common Conditions
ADHD, anxiety, depression, chronic illness, asthma, food allergies, migraines, medical conditions
Specific learning disabilities (dyslexia, dysgraphia), autism, emotional/behavioral disorders, intellectual disabilities, speech/language disorders
Applies In College
Yes — Section 504 protections continue into higher education (disability services offices)
No — IDEA protections end at high school graduation or age 21

A 504 opens a door. An IEP builds a ramp. The question is not which one is better — it's which one your child actually needs to access their education.

— Dr. Farrah Laviolette, MD · Cranbrook Psychiatric Group

Which One Does My Child Need?

This is the question I hear most often from parents — and the honest answer is: it depends on how significantly your child's condition is affecting their learning, and what type of support they need to succeed. Here is the clearest framework I can offer:

Consider a 504 Plan if your child:

Your Child May Need a 504

  • Has ADHD, anxiety, depression, or a chronic health condition that affects learning
  • Can access grade-level curriculum with accommodations in place
  • Does not need specialized instruction or pull-out services
  • Needs extended time, preferential seating, breaks, or reduced homework
  • Functions at or near grade level academically when supported
  • Has been diagnosed by a physician or mental health professional
Consider an IEP if your child:

Your Child May Need an IEP

  • Has a specific learning disability (dyslexia, dysgraphia, dyscalculia) confirmed by testing
  • Is significantly behind grade level despite access to accommodations
  • Needs specialized reading, writing, or math instruction from a trained specialist
  • Has autism spectrum disorder, emotional/behavioral challenges, or speech/language needs
  • Would benefit from pull-out services, a resource room, or modified curriculum
  • Has needs that cannot be met through accommodations alone

How to Request a 504 or IEP Evaluation

Many parents don't realize they have the right to formally request an evaluation — and that this request must be responded to by the school within specific timeframes. You do not need to wait for the school to initiate this process. You can start it yourself, in writing.

How to Request a 504 Plan
  • Write a formal letter to your child's school principal or 504 coordinator requesting a 504 evaluation
  • Include your child's diagnosis (ADHD, anxiety, etc.) and how it affects their learning
  • Attach any supporting documentation — diagnosis letter, neuropsychological evaluation, or psychiatric records
  • Schools are not required to follow strict federal timelines for 504 evaluations, but most respond within 30–60 days
  • Once approved, you will meet with the school team to develop the 504 Plan — you have the right to review and revise it
  • Request a copy of the finalized 504 Plan in writing
How to Request a Special Education (IEP) Evaluation
  • Send a written request to your child's school principal or special education director requesting a "comprehensive psychoeducational evaluation"
  • Under IDEA, the school must respond within 10 school days to your request
  • If approved, the evaluation must be completed within 60 calendar days (timelines vary slightly by state)
  • The evaluation is free and must assess all areas of suspected disability — academic, cognitive, emotional, and functional
  • You will receive a copy of the evaluation report and an invitation to an eligibility meeting
  • If found eligible, the IEP Team meets to develop the IEP — you are a required member of that team
  • You have the right to request an Independent Educational Evaluation (IEE) at school expense if you disagree with their findings

How Psychiatric Documentation Supports Your Request

A formal psychiatric diagnosis and supporting letter from a child psychiatrist is one of the most powerful tools a parent can bring to a 504 or IEP meeting. Schools respond to clinical documentation — it establishes the legitimacy of the condition, its functional impact, and the specific accommodations or services needed.

What a Psychiatric Letter Can Include
  • A formal DSM-5 diagnosis with symptom documentation
  • Description of how the condition specifically impacts academic functioning — attention, memory, anxiety, emotional regulation
  • Recommended accommodations or services based on clinical knowledge of the child
  • Documentation of treatment history and current medications, if relevant
  • A statement supporting eligibility under Section 504 or IDEA
  • Contact information for school staff to follow up directly with the treating psychiatrist

If your child's school is resistant to providing services, comprehensive psychiatric documentation significantly strengthens your position. You also have the right to hire an educational advocate — a professional who helps families navigate the special education system — and this is worth considering in cases of significant disagreement.

Parent Tips for Navigating School Meetings

How to Advocate Effectively
  • Always make requests in writing — verbal agreements are not binding; a paper trail is essential
  • Bring a trusted support person to IEP meetings — a spouse, friend, advocate, or even your child's therapist
  • You are an equal member of the IEP team — you have the right to disagree with, revise, and refuse to sign any IEP
  • Ask for prior written notice before any change to your child's placement or services
  • Request regular progress reports — more frequent than the standard report card cycle
  • Keep all documentation: evaluation reports, meeting notes, emails, and signed agreements
  • If you disagree with the school's findings, you have the right to request mediation or a due process hearing at no cost to you
  • A diagnosis alone does not guarantee eligibility — it must be shown to adversely affect educational performance

This post is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Special education law varies by state, and families with complex situations may benefit from consulting a special education attorney or certified educational advocate in addition to their child's clinical team.

At Cranbrook Psychiatric Group, Dr. Farrah Laviolette, MD routinely provides diagnostic letters, school consultation, and supporting documentation for families pursuing 504 Plans and IEPs for children with ADHD, anxiety, depression, and other psychiatric conditions. We see families via telehealth from the comfort of their own home. Please reach out to our office if we can support your child's educational advocacy.

Selected References
  • National Center for Education Statistics. (2023). Students with Disabilities. Digest of Education Statistics. nces.ed.gov.
  • U.S. Department of Education, Office for Civil Rights. (2022). 2017–18 Civil Rights Data Collection: Students with Disabilities. ed.gov.
  • Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. (2004).
  • Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. § 794.
  • National Center for Learning Disabilities. (2023). State of Learning Disabilities: Understanding the 1 in 5. ncld.org.
  • Zirkel, P.A. & Weathers, J.M. (2015). Section 504-only students: National incidence data. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 26(3), 184–193.
  • American Academy of Pediatrics. (2011). ADHD: Clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of ADHD in children. Pediatrics, 128(5), 1007–1022.
Read More
Farrah Laviolette, MD Farrah Laviolette, MD

Childhood Anxiety Checklist for Parents

Childhood Anxiety Checklist for Parents | Cranbrook Psychiatric Group
For Parents
Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · Cranbrook Psychiatric Group

Childhood Anxiety
Checklist
for Parents

A practical, evidence-informed guide to help you recognize anxiety in your child — across age groups, settings, and symptom types — before it becomes a crisis.

Dr. Farrah Laviolette, MD Child & Adolescent Psychiatrist · Cranbrook Psychiatric Group · Troy, Michigan
How to Use This Guide

Read through each checklist and check the signs you recognize in your child over the past 4 weeks. At the end, use the scoring guide to determine whether an evaluation is recommended.

Anxiety in children rarely announces itself clearly. It doesn't always look like worry. It looks like a stomachache every Monday morning. It looks like a child who won't eat at birthday parties. It looks like rage at homework time, or a teenager who hasn't left the house in two weeks. This checklist is designed to help you see it.

As a child and adolescent psychiatrist, I created this parent-facing checklist because anxiety is both the most common childhood mental health condition and the most commonly missed. Parents often bring children to me months or years after symptoms began — not because they weren't paying attention, but because they didn't have a framework for recognizing what they were seeing. This is that framework.

1 in 8
Children meet diagnostic criteria for an anxiety disorder — making it the most common mental health condition of childhood and adolescence.
Merikangas et al., Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 2010
6 yrs
Average delay between anxiety onset and first treatment. Six years of a child struggling unnecessarily — often in plain sight.
Wang et al., Archives of General Psychiatry, 2005
80%
Of children with anxiety disorders respond positively to treatment — whether therapy, medication, or a combination of both.
James et al., Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2015
01

What Anxiety Looks Like in Children — and Why It's Often Missed

Childhood anxiety presents very differently from adult anxiety — and even differently across developmental stages. A 5-year-old with generalized anxiety disorder may look like a clingy, difficult child. A 10-year-old with social anxiety may appear shy or unmotivated. A 15-year-old with panic disorder may be dismissed as dramatic. None of these children are being difficult. All of them are suffering.

The checklists below are organized by symptom domain. Work through each one thinking about your child over the past 4 weeks. Check any item you recognize — even if you're not certain it's anxiety. At the end, use the scoring guide to interpret your results.

Before You Begin

These checklists are a clinical screening tool — not a diagnostic instrument. A high score does not mean your child has an anxiety disorder, and a low score does not mean they don't. What this tool does is give you language, structure, and evidence for the conversation you may need to have with a professional. Trust your instincts alongside these results.

02

Checklist A: Physical & Somatic Symptoms

Anxiety is a whole-body experience. Children — especially younger ones — often experience and express anxiety primarily through physical symptoms before they have the language for worry. These are frequently misattributed to medical causes.

A
Physical & Body-Based Signs Check all that apply in the past 4 weeks
Frequent stomachaches with no medical explanation Especially before school, social events, or transitions
Headaches that occur in predictable anxiety-provoking situations Mondays, test days, social occasions
Complaints of racing heart, chest tightness, or difficulty breathing May meet criteria for panic attacks if episodic and intense
Muscle tension, shakiness, or restlessness Children may describe this as feeling "jumpy" or "weird"
Sleep disturbances — difficulty falling asleep, frequent waking, nightmares Often accompanied by fear of the dark or being alone
Nausea, vomiting, or loss of appetite before anxiety-provoking events Particularly common in social anxiety and separation anxiety
Frequent urination or bathroom trips in anxious situations Often missed as a behavioral symptom of anxiety
Fatigue despite adequate sleep Chronic anxiety is physiologically exhausting
B
Emotional & Cognitive Signs Check all that apply in the past 4 weeks
Excessive, uncontrollable worry about multiple topics Health, safety, school, friendships, the future — often all at once
Catastrophic thinking — assuming the worst will happen "What if the plane crashes?" "What if I fail?" "What if no one likes me?"
Difficulty concentrating or mind going blank Often misidentified as ADHD — anxiety and ADHD frequently co-occur
Extreme perfectionism or fear of making mistakes May refuse to turn in work that isn't "perfect" or avoid trying new things
Reassurance-seeking — asking repeatedly if things will be okay Temporary relief followed by return of anxiety; never fully satisfied
Irritability, anger outbursts, or emotional dysregulation Anxiety in children often presents as anger rather than fear
Difficulty making decisions — even minor ones Fear of choosing "wrong" is paralyzing for anxious children
Persistent negative self-talk or low self-worth "I'm stupid," "I'm ugly," "Everyone hates me" — often anxiety-driven
C
Behavioral Signs Check all that apply in the past 4 weeks
Avoidance of feared situations, places, or people The single most important behavioral marker of clinical anxiety
School refusal or frequent requests to stay home May present as illness complaints on school mornings specifically
Clinginess or separation difficulties beyond what is age-appropriate Significant concern when persistent past age 6–7 without situational cause
Repetitive behaviors or rituals that must be performed "just right" May indicate OCD spectrum — warrants specific evaluation
Withdrawal from friends, social activities, or extracurriculars Especially significant if representing a change from baseline
Refusing to speak in certain situations (e.g., at school but not at home) May indicate selective mutism — a treatable anxiety-related condition
Procrastination or task paralysis — particularly on feared assignments Avoidance masquerading as laziness or defiance
Increased phone or screen use as an avoidance tool Digital escape is increasingly common in anxious adolescents
D
School & Social Functioning Check all that apply in the past 4 weeks
Declining grades or academic performance without clear explanation
Refusing to participate in class, answer questions, or read aloud
Difficulty eating in the school cafeteria or public settings
Trouble making or keeping friends — fear of judgment or rejection
Excessive concern about what others think of them
Reluctance to participate in extracurricular activities or try new things
03

How to Interpret Your Checklist Results

Count the total number of items you checked across all four checklists (A through D). Use the guide below to interpret your score. Remember: this is a clinical screening tool, not a diagnosis. The number of items checked matters — but so does the severity, duration, and impact on your child's daily life.

1–6
Monitor Closely

Some signs present. Worth discussing with your pediatrician at the next visit. Watch for patterns, duration, and whether symptoms are worsening over time.

7–14
Evaluation Recommended

Multiple domains affected. A professional evaluation with a child psychologist or child psychiatrist is strongly recommended within the next 4–6 weeks.

15+
Seek Help Now

Significant symptom burden across multiple areas. Please contact a child mental health professional as soon as possible. This level of anxiety is impairing your child's daily life.

"Anxiety is one of the most treatable conditions in child psychiatry. The gap between suffering and healing is almost always a referral — and a parent who trusted what they saw."

— Dr. Farrah Laviolette, MD · Cranbrook Psychiatric Group
04

What to Do If Your Child's Score Is High

First: take a breath. A high score on this checklist means your child may be struggling — and that you are now better positioned to help them. Here are the evidence-based next steps:

Effective Treatments for Childhood Anxiety

Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) is the gold-standard treatment for childhood anxiety disorders, with strong evidence across all subtypes. Exposure-based approaches — gradually facing feared situations in a supported way — are the most effective component. Medication (most commonly SSRIs) is often used in combination with therapy for moderate-to-severe anxiety. The combination consistently outperforms either treatment alone.

What Parents Can Do Right Now

Validate your child's experience without reinforcing avoidance — "I know this feels really hard" not "You don't have to go." Gently encourage approach rather than escape. Avoid accommodating anxious behaviors in ways that make the anxiety bigger over time. Model calm, regulated responses to your own worry. And most importantly: get them evaluated. Parental support is essential but not sufficient — professional help changes outcomes.

05

Signs That Require Urgent Attention

Seek Prompt Evaluation — Do Not Wait
  • Your child is refusing to attend school entirely or has missed more than 5 days in the past month due to anxiety
  • Your child is expressing thoughts of self-harm, hopelessness, or not wanting to be alive
  • Anxiety symptoms have escalated rapidly over a short period
  • Your child is no longer eating, sleeping, or engaging in any activities they used to enjoy
  • Your child is engaging in self-reassurance rituals for hours each day that are significantly interfering with daily life
  • Anxiety is accompanied by significant depression, irritability, or mood instability
06

What Parents Most Often Ask Me

Protective Factors — What Reduces Anxiety Risk
  • A secure, warm, and predictable relationship with at least one trusted adult
  • Consistent daily routines that reduce uncertainty
  • Gentle, graduated exposure to feared situations — with support, not force
  • Teaching and modeling emotion identification and regulation skills
  • Physical activity — shown to reduce anxiety symptoms comparably to medication in mild-moderate cases
  • Limited accommodation of avoidance behaviors at home
  • Early access to professional evaluation and evidence-based treatment

This checklist is for educational and screening purposes only. It does not constitute a clinical diagnosis or replace professional evaluation. Every child is different, and this tool should be used as a starting point for conversation — with your child, and with a qualified mental health professional.

At Cranbrook Psychiatric Group, Dr. Farrah Laviolette, MD provides comprehensive psychiatric evaluations for children and adolescents presenting with anxiety, including detailed diagnostic assessment and individualized treatment planning. We see families via telehealth from the comfort of their own home and welcome parents who have questions, concerns, or who would like guidance on next steps after completing this checklist.

Selected References
  • Merikangas, K.R. et al. (2010). Lifetime prevalence of mental disorders in U.S. adolescents. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 49(10), 980–989.
  • Wang, P.S. et al. (2005). Failure and delay in initial treatment contact after first onset of mental disorders. Archives of General Psychiatry, 62(6), 603–613.
  • James, A.C. et al. (2015). Cognitive behavioural therapy for anxiety disorders in children and adolescents. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2.
  • Walkup, J.T. et al. (2008). Cognitive behavioral therapy, sertraline, or a combination in childhood anxiety. New England Journal of Medicine, 359(26), 2753–2766.
  • Rapee, R.M. et al. (2009). Anxiety disorders during childhood and adolescence. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 5, 311–341.
  • Lebowitz, E.R. et al. (2020). Parent-based treatment as efficacious as cognitive-behavioral therapy for childhood anxiety. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 59(3), 362–372.
  • American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. (2020). Practice parameter for the assessment and treatment of children and adolescents with anxiety disorders. AACAP.
Read More
Farrah Laviolette, MD Farrah Laviolette, MD

ADHD Medication: Benefits, Risks, & Common Questions

ADHD Medication: Benefits, Risks, and Common Questions | Cranbrook Psychiatric Group
Cranbrook Psychiatric Group Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · Troy, Michigan
For Parents ADHD · Medication · Child Psychiatry

ADHD
Medication:
Benefits, Risks,
& Common Questions

Dr. Farrah Laviolette, MD Child & Adolescent Psychiatrist · Cranbrook Psychiatric Group · Troy, Michigan

An honest, evidence-based guide for parents navigating one of the most common — and most misunderstood — decisions in child psychiatry.

When a child is diagnosed with ADHD, one of the first questions parents ask me is: "Do they really need medication?" It's the right question to ask. And it deserves a real answer — not a dismissal, not a rushed prescription, and not the kind of fear-based refusal that leaves a child struggling unnecessarily for years. Let's talk about what the evidence actually says.

As a child and adolescent psychiatrist, I have this conversation with families regularly. The decision to start, adjust, or decline ADHD medication is deeply personal — and it should be made with accurate information, clinical guidance, and your values as a family front and center. This post is designed to give you that foundation.

9.8%
Of U.S. children aged 3–17 have been diagnosed with ADHD — making it the most common neurodevelopmental disorder of childhood.
CDC National Health Interview Survey, 2022
70–80%
Of children with ADHD show significant symptom reduction with stimulant medication — the highest response rate of any psychiatric medication class.
Cortese et al., Lancet Psychiatry, 2018
MTA
The landmark Multimodal Treatment Study found medication management superior to behavioral therapy alone for core ADHD symptoms — and that combined treatment produced the broadest outcomes.
MTA Cooperative Group, JAMA, 1999
50%
Of children with ADHD have at least one co-occurring condition — anxiety, depression, or learning differences — making comprehensive evaluation essential before starting medication.
Brown et al., Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics, 2001

What ADHD Actually Is — and Why It Matters for Medication

ADHD is a neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by persistent patterns of inattention, hyperactivity, and impulsivity that are inconsistent with developmental level and interfere meaningfully with functioning. It is not a behavior problem. It is not the result of bad parenting. It is not caused by too much screen time or sugar.

Brain imaging research consistently shows that children with ADHD have differences in the development and activity of the prefrontal cortex — the region responsible for attention, planning, impulse control, and working memory. These differences are associated with dysregulation of dopamine and norepinephrine, the neurotransmitters that ADHD medications are specifically designed to support.

Understanding this matters for the medication conversation because it reframes the question. We are not sedating a wild child. We are supporting a brain that is neurologically undersupplied with the chemicals it needs to regulate attention and behavior.

Types of ADHD Medication: What's Actually Out There

There are three main categories of ADHD medication. Understanding the differences helps parents have more informed conversations with their prescribing clinician.

First-Line Treatment

Stimulants

The most studied and most effective class of ADHD medication. They work by increasing dopamine and norepinephrine availability in the brain. Divided into two families: methylphenidate-based and amphetamine-based. Available in short-acting and long-acting formulations.

Examples: Adderall, Vyvanse, Ritalin, Concerta, Focalin
Non-Stimulant Option

Atomoxetine

A selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) that builds effect gradually over 4–8 weeks. Preferred when stimulants are ineffective, poorly tolerated, or when co-occurring anxiety is present. Not a controlled substance — an advantage for some families.

Brand name: Strattera
Alpha-2 Agonists

Guanfacine & Clonidine

Used as standalone treatments or in combination with stimulants. Particularly effective for hyperactivity, impulsivity, emotional dysregulation, and sleep difficulties associated with ADHD. Often used in younger children or those with tic disorders.

Brand names: Intuniv, Kapvay

Benefits & Risks: The Honest Picture

Parents deserve a balanced, evidence-based accounting of both what medication can do and what its limitations and risks are. Here is that picture, as clearly as I can give it.

Documented Benefits
  • Significant reduction in core ADHD symptoms in 70–80% of children
  • Improved academic performance, task completion, and classroom behavior
  • Better working memory and sustained attention
  • Reduction in accidental injuries — ADHD is a risk factor for accidents
  • Improved peer relationships and social functioning
  • Reduced risk of substance use disorders in adolescence — contrary to popular belief, treated ADHD lowers this risk
  • Decreased risk of academic failure and school dropout
  • Improved self-esteem when functioning improves meaningfully
Known Risks & Side Effects
  • Appetite suppression — often most significant at midday; typically managed with timing adjustments
  • Sleep difficulties — particularly with afternoon doses; addressed with timing or formulation changes
  • Mild increase in heart rate and blood pressure — requires monitoring; rarely clinically significant in healthy children
  • Headaches or stomachaches — often transient, occurring in the first 1–2 weeks
  • Emotional blunting or "zombie" feeling — a signal to adjust dose or try a different medication
  • Rebound irritability as medication wears off — managed with dose timing or extended-release formulations
  • Potential for mild growth deceleration with long-term use — monitored routinely

Medication does not change who your child is. When the dose is right, parents consistently tell me: "I feel like I finally got my kid back." The goal is never compliance. It's access — to learning, to friendships, to the full life they deserve.

— Dr. Farrah Laviolette, MD, Cranbrook Psychiatric Group

Myths vs. Evidence: What Parents Most Often Get Wrong

Common Myths — Addressed Directly
  • "ADHD medication will turn my child into a zombie." A flat, robotic affect is a sign of too high a dose — not an inevitable side effect. It should prompt a dose adjustment, not medication abandonment.
  • "Stimulants are addictive." When used as prescribed, stimulant medications are not addictive in children with ADHD. Research consistently shows that treated ADHD actually reduces — not increases — future substance use risk.
  • "My child will need medication forever." Some children eventually no longer meet criteria for ADHD or find their symptoms manageable without medication as their brain matures. Treatment is reassessed regularly.
  • "Medication is a shortcut — they should just try harder." Asking a child with ADHD to simply try harder without support is like asking a child with poor vision to try harder to read the board. The problem is neurological, not motivational.
  • "Behavioral therapy should always come first." For school-age children with moderate-to-severe ADHD, evidence supports medication as a highly effective first-line intervention — often combined with therapy for the best outcomes.
  • "The dose that works now will always work." Children grow. Weight, brain development, and life demands all change. Medication management is an ongoing clinical process, not a one-time decision.

Questions Parents Ask Me Most

01

At what age can a child start ADHD medication?

The FDA approves stimulant medications for children as young as age 6 for most formulations. For children aged 4–5, the American Academy of Pediatrics recommends behavioral therapy as the primary first-line treatment, with medication considered if symptoms are severe or therapy is insufficient. There is no single right age — it depends on the severity of symptoms, the impact on functioning, and the family's goals and values.

02

How do we know if the medication is working?

We look for meaningful, observable improvement in the areas where ADHD was causing the most impairment — typically attention, task completion, impulse control, and academic or social functioning. I use standardized rating scales (like the Vanderbilt or Conners) completed by parents and teachers before and after medication starts. If we don't see improvement, or if side effects are significant, we adjust. Finding the right medication and dose is a process — it often takes a few trials to optimize.

03

Should my child take medication on weekends and school breaks?

This is a clinical and family decision, not a universal rule. Some children benefit from consistent daily dosing — ADHD affects functioning at home and in social settings, not just at school. Others do well taking breaks on weekends to support appetite and growth. Some families take "medication holidays" during summer to reassess need. I discuss this individually with each family based on the child's profile and goals.

04

What if we try medication and decide it's not right for our family?

Stimulant medication is not a long-term commitment you can't reverse. If you try it and decide the side effects outweigh the benefits, or if it simply doesn't feel right, you stop. There are no significant withdrawal effects with stimulants. Non-stimulants like Strattera require a taper, but the decision to stop is always yours. A trial of medication — managed carefully — carries far less long-term risk than years of unmanaged ADHD.

05

Does medication replace therapy and other supports?

No — and I want to be clear about this. Medication addresses the neurological substrate of ADHD. It does not teach organizational skills, social skills, or emotional regulation strategies. The best outcomes are consistently associated with combined treatment: medication to support brain function, and behavioral or cognitive therapy, parent training, and school accommodations to build skills and structure. Medication opens the door. Everything else helps your child walk through it.

06

What should I tell my child about their medication?

Be honest, age-appropriate, and framing matters enormously. Avoid framing medication as something for "bad behavior." Instead: "Your brain works differently in a way that makes it harder to focus. This medicine helps your brain do what you want it to do — it's like glasses for your attention." Involving your child in the conversation supports their sense of agency and reduces stigma. Older children and adolescents especially need to understand and agree with the plan for it to succeed.

What Good Medication Management Looks Like

Starting ADHD medication is not a hand-off. It is the beginning of an ongoing clinical relationship. Here is what you should expect from any responsible prescribing clinician:

Standards of Good Medication Practice
  • A comprehensive diagnostic evaluation before any prescription is written — not just a 15-minute appointment
  • Baseline measurements of height, weight, heart rate, and blood pressure — and regular monitoring thereafter
  • Standardized rating scales completed by parents and teachers before and after medication starts
  • Clear communication about what to expect in the first 1–2 weeks, and when to call
  • Follow-up within 2–4 weeks of starting or adjusting any medication
  • Regular reassessment of whether medication is still needed, appropriate, and at the right dose
  • Conversations — not assumptions — about your family's goals, values, and concerns at every visit
Red Flags in ADHD Medication Management
  • A prescription written at a first appointment without a thorough evaluation
  • No follow-up scheduled after starting a new medication
  • Dismissal of your concerns about side effects without a plan to address them
  • No communication with your child's school or therapist as part of the treatment plan
  • A dose that hasn't been reassessed in over a year despite your child growing significantly
  • Being told medication is the only treatment your child needs

You Know Your Child. We Know the Evidence. Together We Make the Right Call.

There is no single right answer to whether your child should take ADHD medication. What I can tell you is this: the decision should be made with complete information, without shame, and in partnership with a clinician who takes both the science and your family's values seriously.

Untreated ADHD carries its own very real risks — academic failure, social difficulty, low self-esteem, higher rates of anxiety and depression, and increased accident risk. These costs are often invisible because they accrue slowly, in the background of a child's daily life. The question is never "medication versus no medication." The question is always: what does this child need to thrive?

This post is for educational purposes and does not constitute individualized clinical advice. ADHD treatment decisions should always be made in collaboration with a qualified child psychiatrist or developmental pediatrician who knows your child.

At Cranbrook Psychiatric Group, Dr. Farrah Laviolette, MD provides comprehensive ADHD evaluations and ongoing medication management for children and adolescents in Troy, Michigan. We welcome families who have questions, concerns about a current prescription, or who are seeking a second opinion. You are always welcome to reach out.

Selected References
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2022). Data and Statistics on ADHD. CDC.gov.
  • Cortese, S. et al. (2018). Comparative efficacy and tolerability of medications for ADHD in children, adolescents, and adults: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Lancet Psychiatry, 5(9), 727–738.
  • MTA Cooperative Group. (1999). A 14-month randomized clinical trial of treatment strategies for ADHD. Archives of General Psychiatry, 56(12), 1073–1086.
  • Brown, R.T. et al. (2001). Prevalence and assessment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in primary care settings. Pediatrics, 107(3), e43.
  • American Academy of Pediatrics. (2019). Clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of ADHD in children and adolescents. Pediatrics, 144(4).
  • Wilens, T.E. et al. (2003). Does stimulant therapy of ADHD beget later substance abuse? A meta-analytic review of the literature. Pediatrics, 111(1), 179–185.
  • Swanson, J.M. et al. (2017). Young adult outcomes in the follow-up of the Multimodal Treatment Study of ADHD. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 58(6), 663–678.
Read More
Farrah Laviolette, MD Farrah Laviolette, MD

Warning Signs of Suicide in Teenagers

Warning Signs of Suicide in Teenagers | Cranbrook Psychiatric Group
For Parents Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · Cranbrook Psychiatric Group

Warning Signs of Suicide
in Teenagers

What every parent needs to know — written plainly, with compassion and clinical clarity — so you can recognize the signs before a crisis, not after.

Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · Cranbrook Psychiatric Group
If Your Child Is in Crisis Now

Call or text 988 (Suicide & Crisis Lifeline)  ·  Text HOME to 741741 (Crisis Text Line)  ·  Call 911 or go to your nearest emergency room if there is immediate danger.

This is one of the hardest topics a parent can face. But I want to ask you to stay with me — because reading this post, even if it's uncomfortable, may be one of the most important things you do for your teenager. Suicide is preventable. And the parents who know what to look for are often the ones who make the difference.

Adolescent suicide is a public health crisis that touches families across every demographic, income level, and zip code. As a child and adolescent psychiatrist, I talk about this topic with parents regularly — and I am consistently struck by two things: how many parents had noticed something before a crisis, and how many didn't know what they were seeing. This post is my attempt to close that gap.

#2
Suicide is the second leading cause of death among young people aged 10–34 in the United States.
CDC National Vital Statistics, 2022
1 in 5
High school students seriously consider suicide each year. 1 in 10 will make an attempt.
CDC Youth Risk Behavior Survey, 2023
90%
Of people who die by suicide had a diagnosable, treatable mental health condition at the time of their death.
AFSP: American Foundation for Suicide Prevention, 2023
01

Why Adolescence Is a Particularly Vulnerable Time

The teenage brain is genuinely different from the adult brain — not in a dismissive way, but in a clinically meaningful one. The prefrontal cortex, which governs impulse control, long-term thinking, and emotional regulation, is not fully developed until the mid-twenties. Teenagers feel things intensely, struggle to imagine that circumstances will change, and are exquisitely sensitive to social pain — rejection, humiliation, isolation — in ways that can feel life-altering to them even when they appear manageable from the outside.

This is not weakness. It is neurobiology. And it means that adult coping strategies — perspective-taking, distress tolerance, waiting out a bad feeling — are genuinely harder for adolescents to access. When stressors pile up and protective factors (connection, hope, support) are absent, the risk for suicidal thinking rises. Our job as adults is to be that protective factor.

"The warning signs of suicide are almost always present. The tragedy is not that they were hidden — it's that we didn't yet know what we were seeing."

— Dr. Farrah Laviolette, MD
02

Warning Signs Every Parent Should Know

Research consistently shows that most individuals who attempt or die by suicide communicate their distress beforehand — often in ways that are easy to miss or dismiss. The following warning signs are evidence-based and drawn from clinical literature, the American Foundation for Suicide Prevention, and the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS), a tool widely used in clinical settings.

01

Talking About Wanting to Die

Any direct or indirect statement about wanting to die, not wanting to be alive, or feeling like others would be better off without them. This includes social media posts, song choices, or comments made in a joking tone. Never dismiss this as "just venting." Always take it seriously and ask directly.

02

Withdrawal From People & Activities

A teenager who suddenly pulls away from friends, family, and activities they used to enjoy — especially if this is a change from their baseline — may be experiencing the hopelessness and social disconnection that are strongly associated with suicidal thinking. Isolation is both a symptom and a risk factor.

03

Giving Away Prized Possessions

A teenager who begins giving away meaningful belongings — jewelry, gaming equipment, pets, personal items — may be preparing psychologically for an end. This is one of the most specific behavioral warning signs in the clinical literature and should always prompt an immediate, direct conversation.

04

Expressing Hopelessness or Feeling Trapped

Statements like "Nothing will ever get better," "There's no point," or "I don't see a way out" reflect the cognitive distortions most strongly associated with suicidal ideation. Hopelessness — more than depression itself — is the variable most predictive of suicide risk in research studies.

05

Dramatic Mood Changes or Sudden Calm

Extreme emotional swings are a warning sign — but so is a sudden, unexplained calm after a period of depression or distress. This "calm before the storm" can indicate that a teenager has made a decision about suicide and is experiencing the relief of having a plan. It is not improvement — it requires immediate attention.

06

Increased Risk-Taking Behavior

Reckless driving, substance use, self-harm, or other behaviors that seem indifferent to personal safety can be expressions of passive suicidal ideation — a diminished will to live even without a specific plan. These behaviors deserve clinical attention, not just disciplinary response.

07

Researching Methods or Access to Means

Browser history showing searches about suicide methods, medication overdoses, or access to weapons is a serious warning sign requiring immediate intervention. Means restriction — reducing access to lethal means in the home — is one of the most evidence-supported suicide prevention strategies that exists.

08

Self-Harm (Cutting, Burning, or Similar)

Self-harm is not the same as suicidal behavior, but it is a significant clinical concern and a risk factor for future suicide attempts. It signals that a teenager is in enough emotional pain to hurt themselves — and that they need clinical support, not punishment or dismissal.

09

Saying Goodbye

Reaching out to friends or family members they haven't spoken to in a while, writing notes or letters, or having conversations that feel like final words can all be goodbye behaviors. Trust your instinct if something about an interaction feels different — that instinct is often right.

10

Talking About Being a Burden

Research by Dr. Thomas Joiner identifies "perceived burdensomeness" — the belief that one's death would benefit others — as one of the most significant psychological contributors to suicidal behavior. Statements like "You'd be better off without me" or "I just cause everyone problems" should never be dismissed.

03

What to Do If You're Worried About Your Teen

Many parents hesitate to ask their teenager directly about suicide for fear of "putting the idea in their head." This is one of the most persistent and damaging myths in mental health. The research is clear: asking about suicide does not plant the idea. In fact, it often brings relief — the teenager finally feels seen, heard, and less alone with something they've been carrying in silence.

How to Start the Conversation
  • Choose a calm, private moment — not in the middle of a conflict or immediately after a crisis
  • Be direct: "I've noticed you seem really down lately, and I want to ask — are you having any thoughts of hurting yourself or not wanting to be alive?"
  • Listen without immediately trying to fix, reassure, or minimize — your presence is more important than your words
  • Do not promise to keep it secret — tell your teen that if they are in danger, you will get them help, because you love them
  • Stay calm — your teenager is watching your reaction to gauge whether it's safe to be honest
  • If they say yes — believe them, thank them for telling you, and take action immediately
04

Risk Factors That Increase Vulnerability

Warning signs tell us what to look for. Risk factors tell us which teenagers are at elevated baseline risk — not because they are destined to struggle, but because they may need more intentional support and monitoring. The presence of multiple risk factors significantly compounds overall risk.

Clinical & Personal Risk Factors

Previous suicide attempt (the single strongest predictor of future risk) · Family history of suicide or mental illness · Diagnosed depression, bipolar disorder, anxiety, PTSD, or substance use disorder · Chronic physical illness or pain · History of trauma or abuse · Access to lethal means in the home, particularly firearms

Environmental & Social Risk Factors

Bullying, cyberbullying, or social humiliation · LGBTQ+ identity without family support (risk is 3–4x higher in unsupported LGBTQ+ youth) · Recent loss — relationship, death of a loved one, academic failure · Social isolation or lack of close friendships · Exposure to another person's suicide (contagion effect) · Family conflict, instability, or domestic violence

LGBTQ+ youth are 4 times more likely to attempt suicide than their peers — a risk that drops dramatically with family acceptance and support.
Trevor Project National Survey, 2023
50%
Of suicide attempts in adolescents involve impulsive decisions made within minutes of the trigger event, underscoring the critical importance of means restriction.
Deisenhammer et al., 2009. J Clin Psychiatry.
54%
Reduction in suicide rates when lethal means are restricted — particularly firearms — at the household level. Safe storage saves lives.
Yip et al., 2012. The Lancet.
05

Protective Factors: What Actually Helps

Suicide prevention is not only about reducing risk — it is equally about building protection. The following factors are evidence-supported buffers against suicidal behavior, and many of them are directly within a parent's reach.

Evidence-Based Protective Factors
  • Strong, non-judgmental connection with at least one trusted adult — a parent, relative, coach, or teacher
  • A sense of belonging — at home, at school, in a community, team, faith group, or peer group
  • Access to and engagement with mental health treatment — therapy, psychiatric care, or both
  • Positive reasons for living — personal values, relationships, goals, or beliefs that provide meaning
  • Problem-solving skills and healthy coping strategies — built over time, not just in crisis
  • Restricted access to lethal means — particularly firearms and stockpiled medications in the home
  • Family acceptance and affirmation, especially for LGBTQ+ youth
  • A school environment with strong anti-bullying policies and access to counselors
06

When to Seek Help — and How Urgently

Seek Emergency Care Immediately If Your Teen:
  • Has made a suicide attempt or is actively harming themselves right now
  • Has a specific plan and access to the means to carry it out
  • Is expressing intent to act imminently — "I'm going to do it tonight"
  • Is severely agitated, psychotic, or unable to be safely redirected
  • Has taken pills, cut deeply, or done anything requiring medical attention
Schedule an Urgent Psychiatric Evaluation Within Days If Your Teen:
  • Has expressed any suicidal thoughts, even passively ("I wish I wasn't here")
  • Is showing multiple warning signs listed above, even without explicit statements
  • Has a history of previous attempts and is showing renewed distress
  • Has been exposed to a peer's suicide or suicide attempt
  • Is engaging in self-harm behavior for the first time or with increasing frequency
  • Your instinct tells you something is seriously wrong — always trust that

A Word to Parents Who Are Scared Right Now

If you are reading this because you are frightened about your own child, I want to speak directly to you for a moment. Fear is the right response — and so is action. These two things can exist together. You do not have to feel calm to be effective. You do not have to have the perfect words. You just have to show up, stay present, and get your child in front of someone who can help.

Please do not wait to see if it gets better on its own. Please do not be more afraid of the conversation than of what happens in its absence. Your teenager may resist, may minimize, may tell you you're overreacting. That is okay. Your job is not to be liked right now. Your job is to keep them safe long enough to get them help.

And if you are a parent who has already lost a child — I am deeply, truly sorry. Nothing in this post is a judgment of you. Suicide is a complex, multi-determined tragedy, and love alone cannot always prevent it. Please reach out for support for yourself. You deserve it.

This post is for educational purposes and does not substitute for individualized clinical evaluation or crisis intervention. If your child is in immediate danger, call 911 or go to your nearest emergency room now.

At Cranbrook Psychiatric Group, Dr. Farrah Laviolette, MD provides comprehensive child and adolescent psychiatric evaluations, including urgent consultations for families concerned about their teenager's safety. We are here to help — please do not hesitate to reach out to our office in Troy, Michigan.

988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline: Call or text 988  ·  Crisis Text Line: Text HOME to 741741

Selected References
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2022). National Vital Statistics: Leading Causes of Death by Age Group. CDC.gov.
  • CDC Youth Risk Behavior Survey. (2023). High school student mental health and suicide data. CDC.gov/YRBS.
  • American Foundation for Suicide Prevention. (2023). Suicide statistics and facts. AFSP.org.
  • Joiner, T.E. (2005). Why People Die by Suicide. Harvard University Press.
  • Trevor Project. (2023). National Survey on LGBTQ+ Youth Mental Health. TheTrevorProject.org.
  • Deisenhammer, E.A. et al. (2009). The duration of the suicidal crisis. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 70(1), 19–24.
  • Yip, P.S.F. et al. (2012). The means restriction of suicide: A review. The Lancet, 379(9834), 2393–2399.
  • Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS). Posner, K. et al. (2011). American Journal of Psychiatry, 168(12), 1266–1277.
  • American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. (2020). Practice parameter for the assessment and treatment of children and adolescents with suicidal behavior. AACAP.
Read More
Farrah Laviolette, MD Farrah Laviolette, MD

When Should Your Child See a Psychiatrist?

When Should Your Child See a Psychiatrist? | Cranbrook Psychiatric Group
For Parents · Child & Adolescent Psychiatry

When Should Your Child See a Psychiatrist?

A candid, evidence-informed guide to help parents recognize the signs — and understand that asking for help is never too early.

Dr. Farrah Laviolette, MD Child & Adolescent Psychiatrist · Cranbrook Psychiatric Group · Troy, Michigan

This is one of the questions I hear most often from parents — sometimes whispered at the end of a pediatrician visit, sometimes typed into a search bar at midnight. "Is what I'm seeing serious enough? Should we see someone? Am I overreacting?" The answer, in almost every case, is: if you're asking, it's worth exploring.

Knowing when to seek psychiatric help for your child is not always obvious. Children don't come with instruction manuals, and the line between normal developmental struggles and something that warrants clinical attention can feel blurry from the inside. My goal with this post is to make that line a little clearer — and to reassure you that seeking an evaluation is not a dramatic step. It's a thoughtful one.

50%
Of all lifetime mental health conditions begin by age 14, and 75% begin by age 24. Yet the average delay between when symptoms first appear and when a child receives treatment is 8 to 10 years. Early intervention changes outcomes dramatically. Kessler, R.C. et al. (2005). Lifetime prevalence and age-of-onset distributions of DSM-IV disorders. Archives of General Psychiatry, 62(6), 593–602.

The Difference Between a Psychiatrist and a Therapist

Before we talk about when to seek help, it helps to understand what a psychiatrist actually does — because there's a lot of confusion here, even among parents who are already engaged with their child's mental health.

Child Psychiatrist

A medical doctor (MD or DO) who specializes in diagnosing and treating mental health conditions in children and adolescents. Psychiatrists can prescribe medication, conduct comprehensive evaluations, and coordinate care with therapists, schools, and pediatricians. A psychiatric evaluation is always a good starting point when symptoms are new, unclear, or complex.

Child Therapist / Psychologist

A licensed mental health professional trained in talk therapy and behavioral interventions. Therapists provide ongoing treatment through techniques like CBT, DBT, or play therapy. They do not prescribe medication. Many children benefit most from a combination of psychiatric evaluation and ongoing therapy — these roles work best in partnership.

Signs It May Be Time to See a Child Psychiatrist

There is no single checklist that applies to every child. Development is not linear, and what's typical at one age may be a concern at another. That said, the following are evidence-supported signals that a psychiatric evaluation would be worth pursuing — especially when they persist over time, occur across multiple settings, or represent a change from your child's baseline.

01

Persistent Sadness or Irritability

A child who seems sad, hopeless, or unusually irritable for more than two weeks — beyond typical moodiness — may be experiencing depression. In children, depression often looks more like irritability than sadness. If the mood is affecting daily life, it's time to seek evaluation.

02

Anxiety That Limits Daily Life

All children experience worry — but when anxiety prevents your child from attending school, making friends, sleeping, or participating in activities they used to enjoy, it has crossed into clinical territory. Anxiety disorders are the most common childhood mental health condition, affecting 1 in 8 children.

03

Declining School Performance

A sudden or gradual drop in grades, difficulty concentrating, increasing school refusal, or reports from teachers about attention or behavioral concerns can all point to unaddressed ADHD, anxiety, depression, or learning differences — all of which are treatable with the right support.

04

Significant Behavior Changes

A child who becomes suddenly withdrawn, aggressive, defiant, or dramatically different from their usual self — especially following a life event like a move, loss, or trauma — may be responding to something that needs clinical attention. Behavior is often the language children use when they don't have words.

05

Sleep or Appetite Disturbances

Persistent difficulty falling asleep, staying asleep, nightmares, significant changes in appetite or weight, or disordered eating behaviors are often early warning signs of anxiety, depression, trauma, or other psychiatric conditions that respond well to early intervention.

06

Self-Harm or Talk of Suicide

Any mention of self-harm, suicidal thoughts, or statements like "I wish I wasn't here" should always be taken seriously and evaluated promptly by a mental health professional. This is never attention-seeking. It is always a signal that your child is in pain and needs support — immediately.

07

Disordered Thinking or Perception

If your child is expressing unusual beliefs, hearing or seeing things others don't, experiencing paranoia, or showing dramatic changes in how they organize their thoughts or speech, a prompt psychiatric evaluation is essential. These can be early signs of serious conditions that respond best to early treatment.

08

Substance Use

Experimentation with alcohol or drugs in adolescence often co-occurs with untreated anxiety, depression, ADHD, or trauma. Rather than addressing substance use in isolation, a psychiatric evaluation can help identify and treat the underlying conditions driving the behavior.

09

Your Instinct Says Something Is Wrong

You know your child. If something feels persistently off — even if you can't name exactly what it is — trust that instinct enough to have a conversation with a professional. Parents are often the first to notice the earliest, most subtle signals. Your concern is valid data.

80%
Of children with diagnosable mental health conditions do not receive any mental health services, according to national surveillance data. The most commonly cited barrier? Parents not knowing whether their child's symptoms were serious enough to warrant help. Whitney, D.G. & Peterson, M.D. (2019). US national and state-level prevalence of mental health disorders and disparities of mental health care use in children. JAMA Pediatrics, 173(4), 389–391.
"You do not have to wait until your child is in crisis to seek help. The earlier we intervene, the more options we have."

What About "Normal" Behavior?

Parents often ask me: how do I know if this is just a phase? It's a fair question. Children go through genuinely difficult developmental periods — the defiance of toddlerhood, the social intensity of middle school, the identity turbulence of adolescence. Not every hard stretch requires psychiatric intervention.

The key distinctions to watch for are duration, intensity, and impairment. A child who has a rough month after a family move is likely going through something normal and time-limited. A child whose distress persists across months, intensifies over time, and is meaningfully disrupting their functioning at home, school, or with peers — that's a different picture, and it deserves a clinical eye.

A Helpful Rule of Thumb
  • Is it lasting longer than 2–4 weeks with no improvement?
  • Is it happening in more than one setting — home, school, and socially?
  • Is it causing your child distress, or impairing their daily functioning?
  • Is it a change from your child's usual baseline — not just a hard week?
  • Is your gut telling you this is more than a phase?

If you answered yes to two or more of the above, a psychiatric evaluation is a reasonable and appropriate next step — not an overreaction.

Common Reasons Parents Wait — And Why It's Okay to Move Sooner

What I Hear Most Often
  • "I don't want to label my child" — An evaluation helps us understand your child more fully. Labels, when accurate, open doors to resources, not close them.
  • "Maybe they'll grow out of it" — Some children do. Many don't. Waiting for that to happen naturally costs years of unnecessary suffering.
  • "I don't want them on medication" — Medication is one option, not a foregone conclusion. Many conditions are treated effectively without it.
  • "What will people think?" — Mental health care for children is increasingly normalized and widely accessed. Your child's wellbeing matters more than perception.
  • "We can handle this at home" — Parental support is essential. But some things require professional tools that aren't available at home — and that's not a failure.
  • "I'm not sure it's bad enough" — If you're asking that question, it's already worth a conversation with a professional.

How to Talk to Your Child About Seeing a Psychiatrist

How you introduce this conversation matters — especially for older children and adolescents, who may feel anxious, defensive, or stigmatized by the idea. Here are a few approaches that tend to work well:

Language That Helps
  • For young children: "We're going to talk to a doctor who helps kids with their feelings. She's really good at helping people feel better."
  • For school-age children: "Sometimes our brain needs a little extra help, just like our body does. This doctor is an expert at that."
  • For adolescents: "I've noticed you've been struggling, and I want to make sure you have someone in your corner — someone outside our family who's an expert."
  • For reluctant teens: "You don't have to like going. But I'm asking you to try it once, and we can talk about it after."
  • Always: Be honest, stay calm, and avoid framing it as a punishment or a consequence of bad behavior.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does my child need a referral to see a child psychiatrist?

In most cases, no — you can self-refer directly to a child psychiatry practice. That said, a referral from your pediatrician can be helpful as it typically comes with shared records, which strengthens the evaluation. Check with your insurance plan for specific requirements regarding referrals and coverage.

My child's pediatrician says everything is fine. Should I still seek an evaluation?

Pediatricians provide invaluable primary care, but most have limited time and training for in-depth psychiatric assessment. If your instincts are telling you something more is going on, it is completely appropriate to seek a specialist opinion. Trusting your parental judgment is not the same as dismissing your pediatrician.

What age can a child see a psychiatrist?

Child psychiatrists can evaluate and treat children of any age, including toddlers. Concerns like severe tantrums, developmental delays, early signs of autism spectrum disorder, or significant emotional dysregulation in very young children are all within the scope of child psychiatry. Earlier evaluation is almost always better.

Will seeing a psychiatrist affect my child's future — college applications, career, insurance?

Mental health records are protected by strict privacy laws (HIPAA) and are not shared with schools, employers, or insurance companies without your explicit consent. Receiving psychiatric care does not appear on college applications or background checks. What does affect your child's future is untreated mental illness — academic decline, impaired relationships, lost opportunities. Treatment protects the future; it does not jeopardize it.

How is child psychiatry different from adult psychiatry?

Child and adolescent psychiatry is a subspecialty that requires additional fellowship training beyond general psychiatry. We are trained specifically in how psychiatric conditions present, develop, and respond to treatment differently at various stages of childhood and adolescence — including how medications work differently in developing brains, and how family and school systems are central to treatment.


You Don't Have to Have All the Answers Before You Call

Many parents wait because they feel they need to come in with a clear problem, a well-articulated concern, or certainty that something is wrong. You don't. You can come in with a feeling. You can come in with a list of things that seem unrelated. You can come in saying "I'm not sure, but something feels off."

That is exactly what the evaluation is for. My job is to help you make sense of what you're seeing. Your job is simply to show up.

6 yrs
Is the average time between a child first showing symptoms of a mental health condition and receiving a diagnosis. Six years of a child's life spent struggling without a name for what they're experiencing — and without targeted support. Earlier evaluation changes this. Wang, P.S. et al. (2005). Failure and delay in initial treatment contact after first onset of mental disorders. Archives of General Psychiatry, 62(6), 603–613.

This post is for educational purposes only and does not constitute individualized clinical advice. Every child is different, and concerns should always be discussed with a qualified mental health professional.

At Cranbrook Psychiatric Group, Dr. Farrah Laviolette, MD offers comprehensive child and adolescent psychiatric evaluations in Troy, Michigan. We welcome calls from parents who have questions, are unsure whether an evaluation is appropriate, or simply want to talk through what they're observing. You don't need to be certain to reach out.

Selected References
  • Kessler, R.C. et al. (2005). Lifetime prevalence and age-of-onset distributions of DSM-IV disorders. Archives of General Psychiatry, 62(6), 593–602.
  • Whitney, D.G. & Peterson, M.D. (2019). US national and state-level prevalence of mental health disorders and disparities in mental health care use in children. JAMA Pediatrics, 173(4), 389–391.
  • Wang, P.S. et al. (2005). Failure and delay in initial treatment contact after first onset of mental disorders in the NCS-R. Archives of General Psychiatry, 62(6), 603–613.
  • Merikangas, K.R. et al. (2010). Lifetime prevalence of mental disorders in U.S. adolescents: Results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication–Adolescent Supplement. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 49(10), 980–989.
  • American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. (2022). Facts for Families: When to Seek Help for Your Child. AACAP.org.
  • Costello, E.J. et al. (2003). Prevalence and development of psychiatric disorders in childhood and adolescence. Archives of General Psychiatry, 60(8), 837–844.
Read More
Farrah Laviolette, MD Farrah Laviolette, MD

Effective Discipline Strategies That Preserve Parent‑Child Relationships

Effective Discipline Strategies That Preserve Parent-Child Relationships | Cranbrook Psychiatric Group
Child & Adolescent Psychiatry

Effective Discipline Strategies That Preserve Parent‑Child Relationships

Dr. Farrah Laviolette, MD Child & Adolescent Psychiatrist · Cranbrook Psychiatric Group

By Dr. Farrah Laviolette, MD  ·  Child & Adolescent Psychiatrist, Cranbrook Psychiatric Group

Discipline is one of the most misunderstood words in parenting. Too often, it gets conflated with punishment — something done to a child. But the Latin root, disciplina, means teaching. The most effective discipline is not about control. It's about connection.

As a child and adolescent psychiatrist, I sit with families every day who are navigating power struggles, meltdowns, defiance, and moments of genuine despair. And what I see, consistently, is this: parents who lead with relationship tend to raise children with better emotional regulation, higher self-esteem, and stronger mental health outcomes — even when their kids are deeply challenging.

The good news? Evidence is firmly on the side of warmth and structure working together. You don't have to choose between being kind and being firm.

Children with authoritative parents — those who combine warmth with consistent expectations — are 3 times more likely to demonstrate healthy emotional regulation compared to children raised in authoritarian (punitive) households. Baumrind, D. (1991). The influence of parenting style on adolescent competence. American Psychological Association.

Why Relationship Is the Foundation

Before any discipline strategy can work, the parent-child relationship must be secure. Research from attachment theory — pioneered by John Bowlby and expanded upon for decades — tells us that children who feel emotionally safe with their caregivers are far more receptive to guidance. They're less reactive, more cooperative, and better at internalizing rules over time.

When children feel threatened, shamed, or disconnected, the brain's stress response activates. The prefrontal cortex — the seat of reasoning, self-control, and learning — effectively goes offline. Discipline delivered in that neurological state doesn't teach. It only escalates.

47%
Children who experience frequent harsh or inconsistent discipline are 47% more likely to develop anxiety disorders by adolescence, according to longitudinal research tracking behavioral outcomes across childhood. McLaughlin, K.A. et al. (2012). Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 53(11).

Six Evidence-Based Strategies

The following approaches are grounded in decades of developmental psychology research, and they share one common thread: they teach behavior while protecting the relationship.

01

Natural & Logical Consequences

Rather than imposing arbitrary punishment, allow children to experience the real outcomes of their choices — or create consequences that logically relate to the behavior. This builds internal accountability and teaches cause-and-effect thinking.

02

Emotion Coaching

Pioneered by Dr. John Gottman, emotion coaching teaches parents to validate feelings before correcting behavior. Children who receive consistent emotion coaching show 25% fewer behavioral problems by school age.

03

Positive Reinforcement

Catch your child doing something right. Behavioral research consistently shows that a 5:1 ratio of positive-to-corrective interactions is the sweet spot for sustained motivation and cooperative behavior.

04

Time-In Over Time-Out

Rather than isolating a dysregulated child, sitting with them — co-regulating — teaches them to manage emotions with support before doing so independently. This is especially effective for children under age 8.

05

Predictable Structure

Children thrive when expectations are consistent and communicated in advance. Routines reduce the cognitive load of daily decision-making for both children and parents, lowering daily conflict by up to 30%.

06

Repair After Rupture

No parent gets it right every time. Research by Dr. Dan Siegel shows that relationship repair after conflict is as important — sometimes more so — than the original interaction. Modeling repair teaches resilience.

"The goal of discipline is not a compliant child. It's a connected child who is learning, over time, to regulate themselves."

What the Research Says About Harsh Discipline

The evidence against punitive, shame-based, or physically coercive discipline is now overwhelming. The American Academy of Pediatrics issued a formal policy statement in 2018 recommending that pediatricians universally advise against spanking, verbal shaming, and other forms of harsh punishment — citing decades of longitudinal data on harm.

Research-Supported Findings
  • Physical punishment is associated with increased aggression and antisocial behavior in 93% of reviewed longitudinal studies (Gershoff & Grogan-Kaylor, 2016)
  • Children who are frequently shamed show significantly higher rates of depression and shame-proneness in adulthood (Tangney et al., 2014)
  • Yelling and verbal threats activate the same neurological stress pathways as physical threat — the nervous system does not distinguish between them
  • Unpredictable or inconsistent punishment is more behaviorally damaging than either strict or permissive parenting approaches alone

A Note for Parents Who Are Struggling

If you recognize some of the harmful patterns above in your own parenting — please hear this: you are not a bad parent. You are likely a stressed, depleted, or undertreated parent. Parenting behaviors exist on a spectrum, and they are profoundly shaped by our own childhood experiences, our mental health, our support systems, and the state of our nervous systems on any given day.

Parent-Child Interaction Therapy (PCIT) and Collaborative Problem Solving (CPS) are two structured, evidence-based interventions with robust clinical trial support for improving both child behavior and parent-child relationship quality — even in cases of significant behavioral challenges or trauma history.

80%
Of parents who completed Parent-Child Interaction Therapy (PCIT) reported clinically significant reductions in child behavioral problems, with gains maintained at one-year follow-up. McNeil, C.B. & Hembree-Kigin, T.L. (2010). Parent-Child Interaction Therapy, 2nd ed. Springer.

Practical Starting Points for This Week

Try These at Home
  • Before correcting a behavior, name the emotion you observe: "I can see you're really frustrated right now."
  • Look for three genuine positives to comment on each day — specificity matters more than frequency.
  • When you lose your cool, repair explicitly: "I shouldn't have yelled. I'm sorry. Let's try again."
  • Establish one consistent routine — morning or bedtime — and protect it for two full weeks. Notice what shifts.
  • Replace "because I said so" with a brief, honest explanation. It models reasoning and preserves your child's dignity.
  • If a behavior is escalating, ask yourself: when did my child last eat, sleep, or have unstructured time with me?

This post is for educational purposes and does not constitute individualized clinical advice. If your child's behavioral challenges are significantly impacting daily functioning or your relationship with them, I encourage you to reach out to a qualified mental health professional for personalized support.

At Cranbrook Psychiatric Group, we specialize in comprehensive psychiatric evaluation and treatment for children, adolescents, and families in the Troy, Michigan area. We welcome referrals and self-referrals for consultation.

Selected References
  • Baumrind, D. (1991). The influence of parenting style on adolescent competence and substance use. Journal of Early Adolescence, 11(1), 56–95.
  • Gershoff, E.T. & Grogan-Kaylor, A. (2016). Spanking and child outcomes: Old controversies and new meta-analyses. Journal of Family Psychology, 30(4), 453–469.
  • Gottman, J.M., Katz, L.F., & Hooven, C. (1996). Parental meta-emotion philosophy and the emotional life of families. Journal of Family Psychology, 10(3), 243–268.
  • McLaughlin, K.A. et al. (2012). Childhood adversities and first onset of psychiatric disorders. Archives of General Psychiatry, 69(11), 1151–1160.
  • McNeil, C.B. & Hembree-Kigin, T.L. (2010). Parent-Child Interaction Therapy (2nd ed.). Springer.
  • Siegel, D.J. & Bryson, T.P. (2011). The Whole-Brain Child. Delacorte Press.
  • American Academy of Pediatrics. (2018). Effective discipline to raise healthy children. Pediatrics, 142(6).
  • Tangney, J.P. et al. (2014). Shame, guilt, and remorse. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(2), 85–90.
Read More
Farrah Laviolette, MD Farrah Laviolette, MD

What to Expect During Your Child's First Psychiatric Evaluation

What to Expect During Your Child's First Psychiatric Evaluation | Cranbrook Psychiatric Group
For Parents · Child & Adolescent Psychiatry

What to Expect During Your Child's First Psychiatric Evaluation

A step-by-step guide to help your family feel informed, prepared, and at ease before the appointment.

Dr. Farrah Laviolette, MD Child & Adolescent Psychiatrist · Cranbrook Psychiatric Group · Troy, Michigan

If you've scheduled your child's first psychiatric evaluation, you've already done something brave. Reaching out for help is never easy — and for many parents, it comes after months of worrying, researching, and wondering whether what they're seeing at home is "serious enough" to warrant professional support. It always is.

I want to use this post to walk you through exactly what happens during a first psychiatric evaluation at Cranbrook Psychiatric Group — what we're looking for, how we involve both you and your child, and what comes next. My goal is that by the time you arrive, the only thing you need to focus on is your child.

1 in 5
Children in the United States will experience a diagnosable mental health condition by age 18 — yet less than half of those children will ever receive professional evaluation or treatment. Early identification significantly improves long-term outcomes. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2023). Children's Mental Health Report. CDC.gov.

First: You Are Not Labeling Your Child

One of the most common fears I hear from parents before a first evaluation is this: "I don't want to label my child." I understand that fear deeply. But here's what I want you to know — a psychiatric evaluation is not about attaching a label. It is about understanding your child more fully so we can give them exactly the support they need.

Think of it the way you'd think about any other medical evaluation. If your child had persistent headaches, you'd see a neurologist. You wouldn't worry that the visit would define your child as "a headache person." The same logic applies here. We are gathering information. We are building a picture. And everything we learn is in service of your child's wellbeing.

"A psychiatric evaluation is not about finding what's wrong with your child. It's about understanding who they are — so we can help them thrive."

Before You Arrive: What to Prepare

The more information you can bring to the first appointment, the more productive it will be. You don't need to have everything perfectly organized — but gathering a few key things in advance will help us make the most of our time together.

Helpful to Bring or Have Ready
  • A brief written timeline of when you first noticed your concerns and how they've changed
  • Any previous evaluations, school records, IEP or 504 plans, or report cards
  • A current list of all medications and supplements your child takes, including dosages
  • Medical history: significant illnesses, hospitalizations, developmental milestones, birth history
  • Family mental health history — on both sides — as many conditions have a genetic component
  • Notes from teachers, therapists, or other providers who have observed your child's behavior
  • Any specific questions or concerns you want to make sure we address

If your child is old enough, consider giving them a simple, honest explanation of the appointment before you come. Something like: "We're going to talk to a doctor who specializes in feelings and behavior. She wants to get to know you and help our family." Avoid framing it as a consequence or something to be nervous about.

What Happens During the Evaluation

A comprehensive first psychiatric evaluation typically takes 60 to 90 minutes. It is not a single test or a checklist — it is a clinical conversation, conducted across multiple perspectives. Here is how we generally structure the visit:

1

Parent Interview

We begin by meeting with you — the parent or caregiver — either alone or with your child present, depending on age. I'll ask about your primary concerns, your child's developmental history, family dynamics, school performance, sleep, appetite, social relationships, and any significant life events. This part is crucial. You know your child better than anyone, and I want to hear your full picture without interruption.

Approx. 20–30 minutes
2

Child or Adolescent Interview

I meet with your child individually — the length and depth of this varies by age. With younger children, this may be more observational and play-based. With adolescents, I spend significant time building rapport and hearing their perspective directly. Teens, in particular, often share things in this one-on-one space that they haven't been able to say at home, and that information is invaluable.

Approx. 20–30 minutes
3

Standardized Screening Tools

Depending on your child's age and presenting concerns, I may use validated rating scales — tools like the Vanderbilt Assessment Scale for ADHD, the PHQ-A for adolescent depression, or the SCARED for anxiety. These aren't definitive diagnoses on their own, but they help quantify symptoms and track change over time in a reliable, evidence-based way.

Completed before or during visit
4

Feedback & Collaborative Discussion

We close the appointment together — you, your child (if appropriate), and me. I share my initial clinical impressions, explain my thinking, and present a preliminary treatment plan. This is not a one-way download of information. I want your questions, your pushback, and your priorities. The plan we build should make sense to you and feel manageable.

Approx. 15–20 minutes
70%
Of children who receive early psychiatric intervention show meaningful improvement in functioning within 6 months, compared to those who receive no treatment. The earlier a condition is identified, the more responsive it typically is to treatment. Merikangas, K.R. et al. (2011). Service utilization for lifetime mental disorders in U.S. adolescents. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 50(1), 32–45.

Will My Child Leave With a Diagnosis?

Not always — and that's okay. A single evaluation gives us an important starting point, but psychiatric diagnosis is a clinical process, not a single moment. In some cases, I will have a clear picture by the end of our first meeting. In others, I may need additional collateral information — teacher rating scales, outside records, or a follow-up session — before forming a diagnostic impression.

What I can promise is this: you will leave the first appointment with clarity about the next steps, an understanding of what I'm thinking and why, and a sense that your concerns have been heard and taken seriously.

If a Diagnosis Is Made

I will explain it in plain language — what it means, what it doesn't mean, and what the evidence says about treatment options. We will discuss both medication and non-medication approaches, and I will always explain the reasoning behind any recommendation I make.

If the Picture Is Unclear

We may schedule a follow-up session, request additional information from school or other providers, or refer for psychological testing if needed. Proceeding carefully and accurately is always more valuable than a rushed diagnosis.

Frequently Asked Questions From Parents

Should I tell my child we're going to a psychiatrist?

Yes — always. Children handle uncertainty harder than they handle honest information. Use age-appropriate language and frame it as a positive step. Avoid using the visit as a threat or consequence. Teens especially need to feel respected in this process, not blindsided.

What if my child refuses to talk during the session?

This is more common than you might think, particularly with adolescents. I am experienced in working with reluctant patients — we never force participation. Sometimes the most valuable observation I make is how a child behaves when they feel uncomfortable. Silence tells us something too.

Will my child be put on medication after the first visit?

Not necessarily. Medication is one tool among many, and it is never the only conversation we have. Many conditions respond well to therapy alone, particularly for younger children. When medication is recommended, I explain the evidence, the expected benefits, potential side effects, and what we will monitor. You will never feel pressured.

Is what my child says confidential?

In general, yes — especially for adolescents, confidentiality is an important part of building a therapeutic relationship. I explain limits of confidentiality clearly to both you and your child: if there is a safety concern, I am obligated to share that with you and, if necessary, appropriate authorities. Outside of safety issues, I protect your child's privacy.

How is a psychiatric evaluation different from therapy?

A psychiatric evaluation is a diagnostic and medical assessment — it is focused on understanding your child's presentation, identifying any underlying conditions, and developing a treatment plan, which may or may not include medication. Therapy is an ongoing, relationship-based treatment process. Many children benefit from both, and I will help you understand how they work together.

What to Tell Yourself Before You Come In

Reminders for Parents
  • Seeking help is a sign of attentive, caring parenting — not failure
  • You are not betraying your child by bringing them to this appointment
  • There is no "too early" when it comes to mental health support — early intervention consistently produces better outcomes
  • You are allowed to ask questions, push back, and take time to process any recommendations
  • One evaluation does not lock you or your child into any particular path — it opens a conversation
  • Your instincts as a parent matter; if something feels off, it's worth exploring

After the Evaluation: What Comes Next

Depending on what we find, next steps may include ongoing psychiatric follow-up appointments, a referral to a therapist or psychologist, coordination with your child's school, medication management, or a combination of these. I will always give you a clear summary of my recommendations in writing so you have something to refer back to.

Treatment of childhood psychiatric conditions is rarely a straight line — there will be adjustments, follow-up questions, and moments where the plan evolves. What matters is that you have a trusted clinical partner walking alongside you. That is what we are here to be.

57%
Of parents report that not knowing what to expect was the primary barrier to bringing their child in for a mental health evaluation. Information and preparation meaningfully reduce this barrier and improve follow-through on initial appointments. Gulliver, A., Griffiths, K.M., & Christensen, H. (2010). Perceived barriers and facilitators to mental health help-seeking in young people. BMC Psychiatry, 10(1), 113.

This post is intended for educational purposes and does not constitute clinical advice. Every child is different, and evaluation processes may vary based on age, presenting concerns, and individual clinical need.

At Cranbrook Psychiatric Group, we offer comprehensive psychiatric evaluations for children and adolescents in a warm, family-centered environment in Troy, Michigan. If you have questions about scheduling or what to expect, please don't hesitate to reach out to our office directly. We are here to help.

Selected References
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2023). Data and statistics on children's mental health. Retrieved from CDC.gov.
  • Merikangas, K.R. et al. (2011). Service utilization for lifetime mental disorders in U.S. adolescents. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 50(1), 32–45.
  • Gulliver, A., Griffiths, K.M., & Christensen, H. (2010). Perceived barriers and facilitators to mental health help-seeking in young people. BMC Psychiatry, 10(1), 113.
  • American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. (2022). Practice parameters for the psychiatric assessment of children and adolescents. AACAP.
  • Costello, E.J. et al. (2003). Prevalence and development of psychiatric disorders in childhood and adolescence. Archives of General Psychiatry, 60(8), 837–844.
  • Kessler, R.C. et al. (2005). Lifetime prevalence and age-of-onset distributions of DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Archives of General Psychiatry, 62(6), 593–602.
Read More
Farrah Laviolette, MD Farrah Laviolette, MD

Why Your Anxious Child Always Has a Stomachache: The Science Behind the Gut-Brain Connection

Why Anxious Children Get Stomachaches | Cranbrook Psychiatric Group
Pediatric Psychiatry · Parent Education

"My Stomach Hurts" —
When Anxiety Lives in the Gut

The science behind why children with anxiety so often develop stomach aches, nausea, and digestive complaints — and what parents can do about it.

Dr. Farrah Laviolette, MD
Child & Adolescent Psychiatrist · Cranbrook Psychiatric Group

"My stomach hurts" may be one of the most commonly dismissed complaints in pediatric medicine — and also one of the most misunderstood. When a child with anxiety says their stomach hurts, they are not making it up, seeking attention, or avoiding responsibility. Their body is telling the truth in a language we are only beginning to fully decode.

How Common Is This?

The overlap between childhood anxiety and gastrointestinal (GI) complaints is not coincidental — it is physiological, well-documented, and far more prevalent than most parents realize.

3–4×
More likely for anxious children to experience functional GI disorders vs. non-anxious peers
25%
Of children with recurrent abdominal pain meet criteria for an anxiety disorder
40–60%
Of pediatric functional GI disorders co-occur with anxiety
500M+
Neurons in the enteric nervous system — the gut's "second brain"

Sources: Shelby et al., Journal of Pediatric Psychology; Drossman, Gastroenterology (2016); Gershon & Tack (2007)


Understanding the Gut-Brain Axis

To understand why anxiety causes GI symptoms, we first need to talk about a remarkable biological superhighway — the gut-brain axis. This is a bidirectional communication network linking your child's brain and digestive system in a near-constant dialogue. It operates through the nervous system, the immune system, hormones, and the gut microbiome.

Your child's gut is often called the "second brain" because it contains its own nervous system — the enteric nervous system (ENS) — with over 500 million neurons. This system operates largely independently of the brain, regulating digestion, secretion, and gut motility. But it is deeply wired into the emotional centers of the brain through one key nerve: the vagus nerve.

The Gut-Brain Connection: A Two-Way Street

🧠 Brain
(Amygdala, HPA Axis)
Vagus Nerve
🫁 Gut
(Enteric Nervous System)

Signals travel both directions. Anxiety disrupts the gut. Gut distress amplifies anxiety. The cycle feeds itself.


Five Reasons Anxiety Causes GI Symptoms

There is not a single pathway at work here — there are several simultaneous biological mechanisms, each contributing to the stomach aches, nausea, diarrhea, and cramping that anxious children experience.

🔬 The Biological Pathways — Explained Simply

1
The Stress Response (HPA Axis Activation) When a child feels anxious — whether about school, social situations, or something they can't name — their brain activates the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, flooding the body with cortisol and adrenaline. These stress hormones directly slow gastric emptying, increase gut permeability (sometimes called "leaky gut"), alter bowel motility, and heighten gut sensitivity. The stomach quite literally responds to perceived threat.
2
Serotonin Dysregulation Most people think of serotonin as a "happy brain chemical" — but 90–95% of the body's serotonin is produced in the gut, not the brain. Serotonin regulates intestinal movement (peristalsis). When anxiety disrupts serotonin signaling — as it consistently does — bowel motility is directly impaired, producing the cycle of constipation, diarrhea, and cramping that parents often bring their child to the pediatrician for.
3
Visceral Hypersensitivity Anxious children develop a heightened sensitivity in the nerves lining the digestive tract. Research published in Gastroenterology shows that psychological stress lowers the pain threshold in gut tissue, meaning that normal digestive processes — gas, stomach contractions, movement of food — are perceived as painful or uncomfortable by the anxious child's nervous system. The sensation is entirely real; the threshold is simply lower.
4
Reduced Vagal Tone The vagus nerve is the primary highway between the brain and gut. In anxious children, vagal tone — the nerve's resting activity — is measurably reduced. This impairs the gut's ability to regulate inflammation, manage peristalsis, and balance immune responses in the intestinal lining. Low vagal tone is directly associated with both anxiety disorders and functional GI complaints in children (Bonaz et al., Frontiers in Neuroscience, 2018).
5
Gut Microbiome Disruption Emerging research in Nature Microbiology and related journals shows that chronic stress and anxiety measurably alter the gut microbiome — reducing beneficial bacteria like Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium while allowing pro-inflammatory bacteria to flourish. This microbial imbalance increases gut inflammation and compounds GI symptoms. The relationship between the microbiome and mental health is one of the most active areas of psychiatric research today.

"When a child says their stomach hurts before school, they are not avoiding. Their nervous system is responding to perceived threat — exactly as it was designed to do."

Why the Problem Compounds: The Bidirectional Loop

One of the most important things parents need to understand is that this relationship does not flow in only one direction. Anxiety does not simply cause GI symptoms and stop there. The GI symptoms then send distress signals back up to the brain through the vagus nerve — amplifying the anxiety and creating a self-reinforcing cycle that can be very difficult for children to break on their own.

😰

Anxiety Triggers GI Distress

Brain activates stress response → cortisol release → gut motility changes, pain sensitivity increases, serotonin disrupted → child develops stomach ache, nausea, or diarrhea.

🔄

GI Distress Amplifies Anxiety

Gut pain signals travel back to the brain via the vagus nerve → brain interprets distress → anxiety increases → more gut symptoms → deeper entrenchment of the cycle.

🏫

The School Morning Pattern

Research from Cincinnati Children's Hospital shows GI symptoms peak on school mornings in anxious children and resolve on weekends — confirming psychological, not structural, origin.

⚠️

Why Treating GI Alone Fails

Treating only the GI complaints without addressing anxiety almost never produces lasting relief. The gut will continue to be triggered as long as the underlying anxiety goes unaddressed.


Recognizing Anxiety-Driven GI Complaints in Your Child

Not all stomach aches are anxiety-related, and it is always important to rule out medical causes with your pediatrician. However, there are patterns that clinically suggest anxiety is the driving force:

Signs That GI Complaints May Be Anxiety-Driven

  • Timing patterns: Symptoms consistently appear before specific events — school, tests, social gatherings, or transitions.
  • Weekend relief: Stomach aches that disappear on weekends, holidays, or school breaks, and return Sunday evening.
  • No physical findings: Pediatrician exams and labs repeatedly come back normal despite ongoing complaints.
  • Accompanied by other anxiety signs: Excessive worry, sleep difficulties, clinginess, perfectionism, or avoidance behaviors.
  • Multiple vague complaints: Headaches, dizziness, nausea, and stomach pain appearing together without clear physical cause.
  • Family history: A parent or sibling with anxiety disorders, IBS, or stress-related GI conditions.

A Parent's Guide to Helping

Research-informed strategies for supporting children with anxiety-related GI complaints.

01

Validate the Symptom — Without Reinforcing Avoidance

Saying "I know your tummy hurts and that's real — and I also know you can get through school today" is more effective than dismissal OR excessive accommodation. Research shows that over-accommodating GI complaints can inadvertently reinforce avoidance behavior and deepen the anxiety-GI cycle.

02

Teach Diaphragmatic (Belly) Breathing

Deep, slow breathing directly activates the vagus nerve and increases vagal tone — measurably calming the gut's stress response. Teaching your child to take 4 slow breaths when their stomach hurts is not just soothing — it is neurologically interrupting the HPA stress cascade.

03

Support the Gut Microbiome

A diet rich in fiber, fermented foods (yogurt, kefir), and reduced in ultra-processed foods supports beneficial gut bacteria. While dietary changes alone will not resolve anxiety, microbiome health is an evidence-based adjunct to psychiatric treatment in children with anxiety-GI overlap.

04

Don't Wait to Seek Psychiatric Evaluation

If your child's GI complaints are recurring, affecting school attendance, or causing significant distress — and medical causes have been ruled out — a psychiatric evaluation is appropriate and important. Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) is the gold standard treatment for pediatric anxiety and has been shown to reduce both anxiety symptoms and associated GI complaints concurrently.

05

Consider an Integrated Care Approach

The most effective treatment model pairs psychiatric care with pediatric gastroenterology. At Cranbrook Psychiatric Group, we work alongside your child's medical team to address the psychological underpinnings of functional GI complaints — rather than treating the gut and the mind in isolation.

Your Child's Symptoms Are Real.
And They Are Treatable.

If your child experiences recurring stomach aches, nausea, or GI complaints alongside worry, school avoidance, or anxiety, we can help. Our team specializes in child and adolescent psychiatry with an integrated, evidence-based approach.

Schedule a Consultation

Clinical References

  1. Shelby GD, et al. Functional Abdominal Pain in Childhood and Long-term Vulnerability to Anxiety Disorders. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 2013.
  2. Drossman DA. Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders: History, Pathophysiology, Clinical Features, and Rome IV. Gastroenterology, 2016.
  3. Gershon MD, Tack J. The Serotonin Signaling System: From Basic Understanding to Drug Development. Gastroenterology, 2007.
  4. Bonaz B, Bazin T, Pellissier S. The Vagus Nerve at the Interface of the Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 2018.
  5. Mayer EA. Gut Feelings: The Emerging Biology of Gut-Brain Communication. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2011.
  6. Walker LS, et al. Recurrent Abdominal Pain: Symptom Subtypes Based on the Rome III Criteria for Pediatric Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders. Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, 2012.
Cranbrook Psychiatric Group Troy, Michigan  ·  This content is for educational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Please consult your child's physician or a qualified mental health professional for individualized guidance.
Read More
Farrah Laviolette, MD Farrah Laviolette, MD

Why your child isn't sleeping — and what you can actually do about it: a psychiatrist's guide for parents

Sleep Problems in Children & Teens: A Psychiatrist's Guide for Parents | Dr. Farrah Laviolette, MD
Sleep & Child Psychiatry

Why your child isn't sleeping — and what you can actually do about it: a psychiatrist's guide for parents

"In my practice, sleep problems are among the most common concerns I hear from parents — and among the most underestimated. Sleep is not a passive state. It is when the brain consolidates memory, regulates emotion, and repairs itself. When children don't sleep, everything else suffers."

40–50%
of children experience a sleep problem at some point
Mindell et al., 2006 — Sleep Medicine Reviews
73%
of high school students get less than the recommended sleep
CDC, 2020 — Youth Risk Behavior Survey
higher risk of depression in sleep-deprived adolescents
Gregory & O'Connor, 2002 — J Child Psychol Psychiatry
7 hrs
average sleep US teens get — 2 hrs below what they need
Wheaton et al., 2018 — CDC MMWR
How much sleep does your child actually need? (AAP & AASM guidelines)
12–16 hrs
Infants
4–12 months
(including naps)
11–14 hrs
Toddlers
1–2 years
(including naps)
10–13 hrs
Preschool
3–5 years
(including naps)
9–12 hrs
School-age
6–12 years
8–10 hrs
Teenagers
13–18 years
Important note
These are minimums. Consistently sleeping at the low end of the range is not the same as thriving.

Source: American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) / American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM), 2016

Why sleep matters more than most parents realize

Sleep is not downtime. It is the most neurologically active period of a child's day. During sleep, the brain processes and consolidates learning, prunes unnecessary neural connections, and clears metabolic waste. The hippocampus replays the day's learning during deep sleep, embedding it into long-term memory.

For children and adolescents, sleep deprivation has measurable consequences across every domain: emotional regulation, impulse control, immune function, academic performance, physical growth, and mental health. A chronically sleep-deprived child is not just tired — they are neurologically impaired.

  • Mental health link is direct. Sleep problems predict the onset of depression and anxiety in children — and are also caused by them. Treating sleep often improves mood, and vice versa. (Alvaro et al., 2013 — Sleep Medicine Reviews)
  • Academic performance is measurably impacted. Students sleeping less than 8 hours score significantly lower on tests, have higher absenteeism rates, and show reduced attention and working memory. (Curcio et al., 2006)
  • Physical health consequences are real. Chronic sleep deprivation in children is associated with obesity, reduced immune function, higher rates of accidental injury, and disrupted growth hormone secretion. (Spiegel et al., 1999)
Sleep problems in children vs. adolescents: key differences
Children (3–12)
Adolescents (13–18)
Bedtime resistance and stalling
Night wakings, calling for parents
Nightmares and night terrors
Sleepwalking (peaks ages 4–8)
Fear of the dark, separation anxiety
Early morning waking (toddlers)
Difficulty transitioning off naps
Delayed sleep phase (can't sleep before midnight)
Difficulty waking in the morning
Excessive daytime sleepiness
Insomnia driven by anxiety or depression
Device use displacing sleep
Weekend sleep reversal (social jet lag)
Hypersomnia (sleeping 12+ hours)

Sources: Owens, 2008 — Pediatric Clinics; Carskadon et al., 1998 — Sleep

The most common sleep disorders in children and adolescents — what parents need to know
Behavioral insomnia of childhood
The most common sleep disorder in young children. Two types: sleep-onset association (child only sleeps with parent present) and limit-setting type (chronic bedtime resistance). Affects 10–30% of young children. Highly treatable with behavioral intervention. (Mindell et al., 2006)
Delayed sleep phase disorder
Biologically driven in adolescents — the circadian rhythm shifts 2–3 hours later during puberty. Teens cannot fall asleep before 11pm–midnight regardless of how tired they are. Often misread as laziness or defiance. Affects 7–16% of teens. (Gradisar et al., 2011)
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA)
Affects 1–5% of children. Caused by enlarged tonsils/adenoids or obesity. Signs: loud snoring, witnessed breathing pauses, restless sleep, mouth breathing, bedwetting, daytime hyperactivity (often misdiagnosed as ADHD). Requires formal evaluation. (Marcus et al., 2012 — Pediatrics)
Restless legs syndrome (RLS)
Underdiagnosed in children. Uncomfortable "creepy crawly" sensations in legs at rest, with urge to move. Peaks before bedtime. Linked to iron deficiency and family history. Affects 2–4% of children. Often dismissed as "growing pains." (Picchietti et al., 2007)
Night terrors vs. nightmares
Night terrors occur in the first third of the night — child is inconsolable but not truly awake, with no memory next day. Nightmares occur in the second half (REM sleep) — child awakens fully and can describe the dream. Night terrors affect up to 17% of children ages 3–8 and are benign. (AASM)
Insomnia related to anxiety/depression
The most common sleep problem in adolescents seen in psychiatric practice. Difficulty falling asleep (racing thoughts) or early morning waking (depressive signature) are key diagnostic signals. Treating the underlying disorder is essential — sleep medication alone is not sufficient. (Benca, 2005)
Evidence-based sleep tips for parents — by age group
Young children (3–8 years)
Consistent bedtime routine is the single most powerful tool. A predictable 20–30 min routine (bath → book → lights out) significantly reduces sleep-onset time and night wakings. (Mindell et al., 2009 — Sleep)

Teach independent sleep onset. If your child can only sleep with you present, they will call for you every time they cycle through light sleep (every 90–120 min). Put them down drowsy but awake.

Light matters. Dim lights 30–60 min before bed. Nightlights should be red or amber — not blue or white. Darkness triggers melatonin release.
School-age children (9–12 years)
Set a firm devices-off rule 60 min before bed. Blue light from screens suppresses melatonin production by up to 3 hours. (Chang et al., 2015 — PNAS) Devices should charge outside the bedroom — every night.

Watch for anxiety as the hidden driver. Children who stall at bedtime with questions and worries may be experiencing anxiety that surfaces when distractions disappear. Address the worry, not just the behavior.

Keep weekday and weekend bedtimes within 1 hour of each other. Social jet lag — sleeping in 2+ hours on weekends — disrupts the circadian rhythm and makes Monday mornings significantly harder.
Adolescents (13–18 years)
Work with the biology, not against it. Delayed sleep phase is real. Asking a teen to fall asleep at 9:30pm is biologically equivalent to asking an adult to sleep at 7pm. The AAP recommends middle and high schools start no earlier than 8:30am for this reason.

Phone in a different room — non-negotiable. 73% of teens who sleep with their phone nearby report it waking them at night. The average teen checks their phone 9 times during sleep hours. (Levenson et al., 2016)

Caffeine cutoff at 2pm. Caffeine has a 5–6 hour half-life. A 3pm energy drink still has significant caffeine in the bloodstream at 9pm.
Universal tips for all ages
Exercise promotes sleep quality — but timing matters. Regular physical activity improves sleep onset and duration. Vigorous exercise within 2 hours of bedtime can delay sleep onset in some children. Morning or afternoon exercise is best. (Reid et al., 2010)

The bedroom is for sleep only. When beds are used for homework, screens, and eating, the brain stops associating the bed with sleep. This is stimulus control — a core principle of CBT-I.

Melatonin: helpful but misunderstood. Low doses (0.5–1mg) taken 30–60 min before target bedtime work better than high doses taken at actual bedtime. Always consult your pediatrician before use. Not for nightly indefinite use.
Screens and sleep: what the science actually says
Peer-reviewed research summary
  • Blue light is the main biological culprit. Screens emit blue-wavelength light that signals the brain it is daytime, suppressing melatonin production for up to 3 hours. Even 2 hours of screen exposure before bed measurably delays sleep onset. (Chang et al., 2015 — PNAS)
  • Cognitive arousal matters as much as light. Exciting games, social media notifications, and videos activate the sympathetic nervous system. The brain stays alert long after the screen is off, regardless of blue light.
  • Sleep displacement is cumulative. Each additional hour of screen time before bed is associated with a 9-minute delay in sleep onset and 10-minute reduction in total sleep time in school-age children. (Hale & Guan, 2015 — Sleep Medicine Reviews)
  • Practical solution that works. A centralized family charging station outside all bedrooms — a household rule, not a punishment — is the most evidence-supported intervention for screen-related sleep disruption. Consistency across all family members models the expectation.
Clinical guidelines & treatment resources

AAP Sleep Policy Statement (2016) — Recommends structured sleep education at every well-child visit. Endorses behavioral sleep interventions (not medication) as first-line treatment for behavioral insomnia in young children. Screen-free bedrooms endorsed for all ages.

AASM Pediatric Sleep Guidelines — The gold standard for diagnosing and treating pediatric sleep disorders. Recommends polysomnography (overnight sleep study) for suspected OSA, RLS, or narcolepsy. Primary care evaluation is always the first step.

CBT-I (Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia) — The most evidence-supported treatment for chronic insomnia in children and adolescents. Includes sleep restriction, stimulus control, sleep hygiene education, and cognitive restructuring. Superior to sleep medication in long-term outcomes. (Morin et al., 2006)

AAP School Start Time Policy (2014, reaffirmed 2019) — The AAP officially recommends middle and high schools start no earlier than 8:30am. Early start times are a public health issue — not a parenting or motivation problem. Parents can advocate at the district level.

When to consult your pediatrician or a child psychiatrist
  • Loud, habitual snoring — especially with witnessed pauses in breathing or gasping
  • Bedwetting that begins or returns after a period of being dry in school-age children
  • Extreme daytime sleepiness despite adequate time in bed — especially if sudden onset
  • Chronic insomnia lasting more than 3 months despite consistent sleep hygiene efforts
  • Sleep problems accompanied by anxiety, depressed mood, irritability, or school refusal
  • Frequent sleepwalking — especially if the child is in danger of leaving the home
  • Hypersomnia: consistently sleeping 12+ hours and still unable to function during the day
  • Uncomfortable leg sensations at night disrupting sleep onset — possible restless legs syndrome

A final word from my practice: Sleep is one of the most powerful and underutilized tools for children's mental and physical health. Before we add a diagnosis, before we add a medication, I always ask: how is this child sleeping? The answer almost always matters. If your child is struggling — behaviorally, emotionally, academically — and sleep has not been evaluated, that is always the right place to start. A well-rested child is a different child.

Read More
Farrah Laviolette, MD Farrah Laviolette, MD

Your teenager isn't broken — but here's what to watch for: a psychiatrist's guide to adolescent development

Normal vs. Abnormal Teen Behavior: A Psychiatrist's Guide for Parents | Dr. Farrah Laviolette, MD
Adolescent Psychiatry

Your teenager isn't broken — but here's what to watch for: a psychiatrist's guide to adolescent development

"Parents of teenagers often come to me asking 'Is this normal?' more than almost any other question. The answer is almost always nuanced — and knowing the difference between typical adolescent development and something that warrants professional attention can make all the difference."

75%
of mental health disorders emerge before age 24
Kessler et al., 2005 — Arch Gen Psychiatry
1 in 5
adolescents has a diagnosable mental health condition
NIMH, 2023
11 yrs
average delay from first symptoms to first treatment
Wang et al., 2005 — WHO Survey
Age 25
when the prefrontal cortex reaches full maturity
Casey et al., 2008 — Dev Science
The adolescent brain: what is actually happening

Adolescence is the most dramatic period of brain development after infancy. The brain is not simply "growing up" — it is being fundamentally reorganized. The limbic system (emotions, reward, impulse) matures years before the prefrontal cortex (judgment, planning, consequences). This structural mismatch is not a flaw. It is biology.

At age 16, your teen's emotional brain is running at full speed while the braking system is still under construction. Risk-taking, intensity of feeling, sensitivity to peer opinion, and the push for independence are not personality defects — they are neurologically driven and evolutionarily purposeful.

Early (11–13)
Puberty onset, emotional intensity, identity questioning begins, peer influence rises sharply.
Middle (14–16)
Risk-taking peaks, parent conflict highest, romantic interest, academic pressure intensifies.
Late (17–19)
Identity consolidates, emotional regulation improves, future planning capacity increases.

Source: Steinberg, 2008 — Developmental Science; Casey et al., 2008

What's normal at 16 — a developmental checklist
Based on AAP & AACAP developmental milestones
  • Pulling away from parents. Spending more time with peers than family is healthy and expected. Individuation — forming a separate identity — requires emotional distance. (Erikson, Identity vs. Role Confusion)
  • Mood swings and emotional intensity. The limbic system is hyperreactive in adolescence. Rapid mood shifts and emotional outbursts are developmentally typical — especially in early-to-mid adolescence.
  • Questioning rules, values, and authority. This is how identity forms. Teens who never challenge their parents' beliefs rarely develop a stable independent identity. Disagreement is healthy. Contempt is different.
  • Increased sleep need. Circadian rhythm shifts in adolescence mean teens are biologically wired to fall asleep later and wake later. A 16-year-old needing 8–10 hours is not lazy — it is physiology. (Carskadon et al., 1998)
  • Experimenting with identity. Trying on different personas — fashion, music, beliefs, friend groups — is the core developmental task of adolescence. Frequent changes are entirely normal.
The 5 core developmental tasks of adolescence every parent should understand
Identity formation
Erikson's fifth stage: "Who am I?" The teen must explore roles, values, and beliefs to form a stable self. This requires experimentation — and some conflict with parents.
Peer attachment shift
Peers replace parents as the primary social reference. Peer approval becomes neurologically rewarding in ways that powerfully influence behavior. (Gardner & Steinberg, 2005)
Romantic & sexual development
Developing intimate relationships is a core developmental task. Teens at 16 are navigating attraction, rejection, and connection — all emotionally amplified by neurobiology.
Autonomy & independence
Moving from dependent child to self-reliant adult requires practice. Pushing limits, making decisions, and experiencing consequences are all part of healthy development.
Academic & future orientation
Late adolescence brings increasing capacity for abstract thinking and future planning. College and career decisions begin to feel real and can trigger significant anxiety.
Moral & ethical reasoning
Teens develop genuine moral reasoning — questioning fairness, justice, hypocrisy. They may call out adult inconsistencies with surprising precision. This is healthy cognitive development.
Normal vs. concerning: side by side
Typically normal Warrants attention
Normal at 16
Seek evaluation if...
Occasional sadness lasting days
Mood shifts tied to social events
Preferring friends over family
Some mild risk-taking behavior
Sleeping 9–10 hrs on weekends
Arguing about rules and limits
Worrying about grades or social life
Body consciousness, eating changes
Depressed mood most days, 2+ weeks
Mood unrelated to events, empty affect
Complete withdrawal from everyone
Dangerous risk-taking, substance use
Sleeping 12+ hrs, unable to get up
Physical aggression or destruction
Panic attacks, school refusal, paralysis
Restricting food, purging, extreme weight loss

Sources: AAP Bright Futures; AACAP Practice Parameters; DSM-5

Social media, screens, and your 16-year-old

The average US teen spends 7.5 hours per day on screens outside of schoolwork (Common Sense Media, 2021). The research is more nuanced than most headlines suggest.

  • Passive scrolling is the concern. Research by Twenge et al. (2018) links passive social media consumption to higher rates of depression and loneliness, especially in girls. The dose and direction of use both matter.
  • Active use is different. Teens who use social media to maintain relationships and create content show fewer negative mental health outcomes. Quality of use matters more than raw quantity.
  • Sleep disruption is the clearest harm. Devices in the bedroom after 10pm consistently predict shorter sleep and higher rates of depression in adolescents. (Cain & Gradisar, 2010) This is the one evidence-based limit worth enforcing.
  • Conversation beats restriction. Teens whose parents discuss social media content show better self-regulation than teens with strict but unexplained bans. (Padilla-Walker et al., 2012)
Red flags that always warrant a psychiatric evaluation
  • Any mention of suicide, self-harm, or not wanting to be alive — even "as a joke"
  • Significant unexplained weight loss or food restriction behaviors
  • Suspected substance use: alcohol, cannabis, vaping, or any other drug
  • Prolonged school refusal or dramatic decline in academic functioning
  • Auditory or visual hallucinations — hearing or seeing things others do not
  • Paranoia, disorganized thinking, or sudden dramatic personality change
  • Persistent depressed or empty mood lasting more than 2 weeks
  • Complete loss of interest in all previously enjoyed activities (anhedonia)
What research says actually works: parenting a 16-year-old
Evidence-based parenting strategies
  • Authoritative parenting remains the gold standard. High warmth + clear expectations outperforms both permissive and authoritarian styles across mental health, academic, and substance use outcomes. (Steinberg et al., 1994 — Developmental Psychology)
  • Listen more than you advise. Teens are more likely to confide in parents who ask open questions and resist the urge to immediately fix or lecture. The goal at 16 is to remain a trusted adult — not an authority to route around.
  • Unstructured time together matters. Research shows teens disclose more during low-stakes, side-by-side activities — driving, cooking, watching TV — than during face-to-face "talks." Create proximity, not interrogation. (Laursen & Collins, 2009)
  • Keep the door open explicitly. Teens who believe their parents will react with anger or panic are less likely to disclose problems. Saying "You can always come to me, no matter what" — and meaning it — significantly increases disclosure. (Stattin & Kerr, 2000)
Key clinical guidelines & resources

AACAP Practice Parameters for Adolescent Depression (updated 2018) — Annual depression screening via the PHQ-A is recommended for all adolescents. First-line treatment is CBT or IPT; fluoxetine is the only FDA-approved antidepressant for adolescents under 18.

USPSTF Recommendations (2023) — Recommends screening all adolescents 12–18 for major depressive disorder and anxiety where adequate follow-up systems are in place. Early identification is the primary lever for improved long-term outcomes.

AAP Bright Futures Guidelines — Comprehensive developmental surveillance at every well-adolescent visit covering mental health, substance use, sexual health, and sleep. Parents can request any of these topics be addressed directly at the visit.

Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) — A free, validated tool used in emergency departments and schools. If you are ever uncertain whether a teen's statements about death are serious, this tool can guide the conversation with a provider.

A note to parents of teenagers: The years between 14 and 18 are among the most neurologically turbulent of a human life. Your teen does not need you to be their friend. They need you to be a stable, non-reactive, emotionally available adult who holds limits with warmth. That is harder than it sounds — and more important than almost anything else you can do. If you are unsure whether what you are seeing is normal, trust that instinct. An evaluation is never a failure. It is how we catch things early.

Read More
Farrah Laviolette, MD Farrah Laviolette, MD

When your child loses control: what science actually tells us about tantrums

When Your Child Loses Control — Dr. Farrah Laviolette, MD
Child Development

When your child loses control: what science actually tells us about tantrums

"As a child psychiatrist, one of the most common questions I hear from parents is: 'Am I doing something wrong when my child has a meltdown?' The short answer is no — and the longer answer is surprisingly reassuring."

87%
of toddlers 18–36 months have tantrums regularly
Wakschlag et al., 2012
~1.5
tantrums per day is average for children aged 1–4
Journal of Pediatrics
11 min
average duration when not escalated by parents
Potegal & Davidson, 2003
1
Why tantrums happen — the brain science

Tantrums are not manipulative behavior. In children under age 4, the prefrontal cortex — the brain's regulation center — is dramatically underdeveloped. When frustration, hunger, fatigue, or overstimulation hits, children simply do not have the neurological hardware to manage those feelings. What you're witnessing is not a character flaw; it is a developmental stage.

Ages 1–2
Language gap frustration. Can't express needs. Physical outbursts are primary communication.
Ages 2–3
Autonomy conflict. "Me do it" collides with limits. Peak tantrum frequency.
Ages 3–5
Emotional vocabulary emerging. Tantrums shift toward verbal protest as language grows.

Source: Zero to Three; Potegal et al., 2003

2
Do's and don'ts — at a glance
Do
Stay physically close but calm
Use short, consistent phrases
Wait for the window to close
Reconnect warmly afterward
Teach emotion words later, in calm
Don't
Give in to stop the crying
Shame or mock the child
Escalate your own tone
Reason or explain at the peak
Threaten consequences mid-tantrum
!
When to seek professional evaluation
  • Tantrums consistently lasting 25+ min or 5+ daily after age 4
  • Self-injurious behavior during episodes (head-banging, breath-holding)
  • Tantrums worsening after age 4 rather than decreasing
  • No language by 18 months or regression in acquired skills
3
Proven in-the-moment strategies
Evidence-based — RCT & peer-reviewed support
  • Stay regulated yourself first. Parental calm directly reduces tantrum intensity. Children co-regulate through adult nervous systems. (Siegel & Bryson, 2011)
  • Don't reason during the peak. During acute distress the cortex is offline. Save explanations for after the storm — typically 5–15 min later.
  • Hold the limit, not the lecture. Repeat one simple phrase calmly. Negotiating under pressure teaches escalation.
  • Name the emotion without solving it. "You're really frustrated." Labeling activates the prefrontal cortex and reduces amygdala reactivity. (Lieberman et al., 2007, UCLA)
  • Reduce stimulation. Move to a quieter space. Environmental de-escalation reduces cortisol faster than verbal intervention in under-3s.
4
Prevention: what reduces tantrum frequency
  • Sleep — the #1 modifiable factor. Sleep-deprived toddlers have significantly higher frequency and intensity. Ages 1–3 need 12–14 hrs/day including naps. (AAP, 2016)
  • Hunger prevention ("hangry" is real). Blood glucose dips sharply between toddler meals. A small snack 30 min before known high-risk windows measurably reduces episodes.
  • Transition warnings. A 5-minute warning reduces resistance behavior by up to 40% in preschool-age children. (Ostrov & Keating, 2004)
  • Autonomy scaffolding. Offer limited real choices ("red cup or blue cup?") to satisfy the developmental drive for control without surrendering authority. One of the most replicated findings in developmental psychology.
5
Evidence-based guidelines & frameworks

American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) — Recommends against physical punishment for tantrum management. Supports consistent, predictable responses and positive attention as the primary prevention strategy.

CDC "Learn the Signs, Act Early" — Provides developmental milestones to help parents distinguish typical tantrums from potential signs of developmental or emotional delays requiring evaluation.

Parent-Child Interaction Therapy (PCIT) — Gold-standard treatment with 10+ RCTs showing significant reduction in disruptive behavior. Two phases: child-directed interaction (warmth) then parent-directed interaction (limit setting).

Triple P (Positive Parenting Program) — WHO-endorsed, studied in 25+ countries. Shows a 30–48% reduction in behavior problems with consistent implementation. Available as in-person and digital modules.

A note for parents: Surviving a tantrum in public while every stranger stares is one of the hardest moments in early parenting. The research is clear — your calm, consistent presence is the single most powerful tool you have. You are not failing. You are exactly what your child needs.

Read More
Farrah Laviolette, MD Farrah Laviolette, MD

Understanding Adolescent Self-Harm: A Guide for Parents

Understanding Adolescent Self-Harm — Dr. Farrah Laviolette, MD
Dr. Farrah Laviolette, MD
For Parents
Mental Health Adolescent Wellbeing

Understanding Adolescent Self-Harm: A Guide for Parents

When panic is the natural response — here is what the clinical evidence says about slowing down, staying connected, and finding a path forward together.

Dr. Farrah Laviolette, MD
Child & Adolescent Psychiatry  ·  10-min read

Navigating the teenage years is often like walking a tightrope in a windstorm. When parents discover that their teen is engaging in Non-Suicidal Self-Injury (NSSI) — such as scratching, hitting oneself, or pulling hair — the natural instinct is often panic.

However, understanding the "why" behind the behavior is the first step toward healing. Here is what the clinical research tells us about why this happens, and how you can help.

"The instinct to panic is understandable. But staying regulated yourself is one of the most powerful things you can do for your teen."


Why Do They Do It?

According to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) and literature from the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (AACAP), NSSI is rarely about "attention-seeking." Instead, it is primarily a maladaptive emotion regulation strategy — a way of coping when no better tools are available.

Emotional Regulation

For many teens, physical pain acts as a "circuit breaker" for intense emotional overwhelm. It can provide a momentary sense of calm or a release of built-up tension when internal pressure feels unbearable.

Turning the Invisible Visible

Adolescents often struggle to articulate psychological pain. Physical marks serve as a tangible manifestation of their internal distress — a way of communicating what words cannot reach.

Combatting Numbness

In cases of severe depression or dissociation, some teens use self-injury to "feel something" and reconnect with their bodies. The goal is not harm — it is presence.


Why Parents Should Stay Calm

It sounds counterintuitive — but a panicked reaction can unintentionally make the situation worse. Here is why a measured response is not just helpful, but clinically vital:

1

Lowering the Shame Spiral

Self-harm is often shrouded in intense guilt. A high-conflict or panicked reaction from a parent can increase the teen's stress, potentially leading to more self-harm to cope with that new layer of shame.

2

Maintaining the Connection

Your teen needs to know you are a safe harbor. If you react with anger or extreme fear, they may become more secretive to "protect" you — or to avoid your reaction entirely.

3

It Is Usually Not a Suicide Attempt

It is crucial to distinguish between NSSI and a suicide attempt. While NSSI is a risk factor that requires professional attention, the immediate intent is usually to survive the moment — not to end life.


Helpful Tips to Combat NSSI

Addressing self-harm requires a blend of professional support and at-home replacement skills. The following strategies are drawn from clinical best practices:

Strategy Actionable Step
Validate, Don't Judge "I can see you're in a lot of pain right now. I'm here for you, and we're going to figure this out together." Acknowledgment before action — always.
The "TIPP" Skill Borrowed from Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT), use Temperature to interrupt the body's stress response. Have your teen hold an ice cube or splash cold water on their face to dampen the "fight or flight" reaction.
Harm Replacement Encourage safer releases of tension — snapping a rubber band against the wrist, or drawing on the skin with a red marker instead of scratching. The goal is redirection, not perfection.
Professional Help Seek a therapist specializing in DBT (Dialectical Behavior Therapy) or CBT (Cognitive Behavioral Therapy) — the gold standards for treating NSSI in adolescents.
⚠️

Important: If you believe your child is in immediate danger or the injuries are severe, please contact emergency services or a crisis hotline immediately. The 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline (call or text 988) is available 24/7 for any mental health crisis, including self-harm.

Discovering self-harm is a heavy burden — but it is a treatable behavior. By replacing judgment with curiosity and panic with a plan, you provide the stability your teen needs to learn healthier ways to cope. You do not have to navigate this alone, and neither does your child.

A Question to Consider

Does your teen currently have a therapist or a school counselor you feel comfortable coordinating with?

This blog is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice.
If you have concerns about your child's mental health or safety, please consult a qualified healthcare provider.
Read More
Farrah Laviolette, MD Farrah Laviolette, MD

Anxiety in children vs. adults: why it looks so different — and why that matters

Anxiety in Children vs. Adults: Why It Looks Different | Dr. Farrah Laviolette, MD
Child & Adolescent Psychiatry

Anxiety in children vs. adults: why it looks so different — and why that matters

"One of the most common reasons anxiety in children goes undetected is that parents and providers are looking for adult symptoms — worry, rumination, and dread. But in young people, anxiety often speaks a completely different language."

31.9%
of adolescents meet criteria for an anxiety disorder
Merikangas et al., 2010 — Arch Gen Psychiatry
6 yrs
average delay between anxiety onset and first treatment
Wang et al., 2005 — WHO World Mental Health Survey
50%
of adult anxiety disorders began before age 11
Kessler et al., 2005 — Arch Gen Psychiatry
2–3×
more likely to go undiagnosed in children than adults
Costello et al., 2004 — Arch Gen Psychiatry
Why the presentation differs: the developing brain

The prefrontal cortex — responsible for recognizing, labeling, and regulating emotion — does not fully mature until the mid-20s. Children and adolescents literally lack the neurological infrastructure to identify anxiety as anxiety. Instead, the signal gets routed through the body (stomachaches, headaches), behavior (avoidance, clinging, irritability), or performance (school refusal, declining grades).

Adults, by contrast, have developed metacognitive awareness — the ability to observe their own mental states. They can say "I'm anxious about this presentation." A 7-year-old experiencing the same autonomic activation says nothing, or says "my stomach hurts," or explodes when asked to go to school.

Ages 3–6
Separation fears, nightmares, clinging. Normal fears (dark, monsters) become impairing.
Ages 7–12
School refusal, somatic complaints, social withdrawal, perfectionism, reassurance-seeking.
Ages 13–17
Social anxiety peaks, performance anxiety, panic, substance use as self-medication.

Source: Cartwright-Hatton et al., 2006; Rapee et al., 2009 — Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry

Side-by-side: how anxiety presents at each life stage
Children & adolescents
Stomachaches, headaches, nausea with no medical cause
Irritability and anger rather than expressed worry
School refusal or frequent nurse visits
Clinging, separation distress, tantrums at drop-off
Excessive reassurance-seeking ("are you sure it's safe?")
Sleep disturbances, nightmares, resistance to bedtime
Avoidance misread as defiance or laziness
Perfectionism, fear of failure, procrastination
Adults
Recognized worry about specific domains (work, health, finances)
Rumination and catastrophic thinking reported directly
Work avoidance, absenteeism, presenteeism
Relationship tension, withdrawal from social activities
Insight into anxiety — "I know I'm being irrational"
Insomnia, racing thoughts at night
Avoidance recognized as anxiety-driven
Muscle tension, fatigue, difficulty concentrating

Sources: APA DSM-5; Weems & Stickle, 2005; Beesdo-Baum & Kessler, 2009

The "masked" symptoms parents most often miss
Irritability & aggression
Anxiety activates the fight response. Many anxious children look angry, not scared. Frequently misdiagnosed as ODD or ADHD.
School refusal
Up to 28% of school refusal cases are anxiety-driven (Kearney, 2008). Often mistaken for laziness or manipulation by parents and teachers.
Somatic complaints
75% of anxious children report unexplained physical symptoms. The gut-brain axis is highly active in pediatric anxiety. (Campo et al., 2004)
Perfectionism
High achievement can mask anxiety. The "model student" may be driven by fear of failure, not motivation. (Flett & Hewitt, 2002)
Social withdrawal
Children with social anxiety are often labeled "shy" or "quiet." Social anxiety disorder affects 9% of adolescents. (NIMH, 2017)
Sleep problems
Bedtime resistance and nighttime fears in children aged 6–12 are the strongest behavioral predictors of GAD. (Gregory & Eley, 2005)
What the research tells us about diagnosis
Evidence-based — peer-reviewed research
  • DSM-5 acknowledges developmental differences. The diagnostic criteria for GAD in children requires only 1 physical symptom vs. 3 for adults, recognizing that children express anxiety more somatically. (APA, 2013)
  • Anxiety is the most prevalent mental health condition in youth. 31.9% of adolescents meet lifetime criteria — higher than depression, ADHD, and behavioral disorders combined. (Merikangas et al., 2010)
  • Early onset predicts adult severity. Children who develop anxiety before age 12 are significantly more likely to develop comorbid depression and substance use disorders in adulthood. (Pine et al., 1998 — JAMA)
  • Sex differences emerge at puberty. Before age 12, boys and girls show similar rates. After puberty, females are 2× more likely to develop anxiety disorders — a gap that persists into adulthood. (McLean et al., 2011)
Evidence-based treatments that work
  • Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) — first-line treatment. 60–80% response rate in pediatric anxiety. The Coping Cat program (Kendall, 1994) is the most studied manualized protocol for children ages 7–13.
  • Parent involvement is critical in children. Unlike adult therapy, pediatric anxiety treatment requires active parent participation. Parental accommodation worsens anxiety long-term. (Lebowitz et al., 2020 — JAMA Psychiatry)
  • SSRIs are FDA-indicated for pediatric anxiety. The CAMS trial (Walkup et al., 2008 — NEJM) showed sertraline + CBT achieved an 81% combined response rate — outperforming either treatment alone.
  • Exposure therapy is the active ingredient. Gradual, supported exposure to feared situations — not avoidance — is the mechanism by which anxiety remits. This applies across all ages but requires age-appropriate scaffolding in children.
When to seek professional evaluation for your child
  • Persistent avoidance of school, social events, or activities lasting 2+ weeks
  • Unexplained stomachaches or headaches with no medical cause, especially before school
  • Intense distress at separations that has not improved by age 5–6
  • Significant sleep difficulties (difficulty falling asleep, nightmares) most nights
  • Increasing reassurance-seeking that disrupts family functioning
  • Grades declining or inability to complete schoolwork due to worry or perfectionism
  • Panic episodes: racing heart, shortness of breath, feeling of doom
  • Any mention of not wanting to be alive or self-harming behaviors
Key clinical guidelines & resources

AACAP Practice Parameters (2007, updated 2020) — Recommends CBT as first-line and SSRIs as adjunctive treatment for pediatric anxiety. Screening at every well-child visit is recommended from age 8 onward.

USPSTF Anxiety Screening Recommendation (2023) — Recommends screening for children and adolescents ages 8–18 without a diagnosed anxiety disorder — a landmark shift toward universal early detection in primary care.

NICE Guidelines — Anxiety Disorders in Children — Recommends guided self-help CBT as step 1, individual CBT with parental involvement as step 2, and combined medication + CBT for moderate-to-severe presentations.

SCARED Screening Tool (Birmaher et al., 1997) — A free, validated 41-item tool for children ages 8–18. Both parent and child versions available. A score of ≥25 suggests an anxiety disorder warranting clinical evaluation.

A note for parents and caregivers: An anxious child is not a "difficult" child. They are a child whose nervous system is working harder than it should have to. The earlier anxiety is recognized and treated, the better the long-term outcome — for childhood, adolescence, and the adult they will become. If something feels off, trust that instinct and ask for help.

Read More
Farrah Laviolette, MD Farrah Laviolette, MD

Psychiatrist or Therapist — Which One Do You Actually Need?

Psychiatrist vs Therapist: Which Do You Need? | Cranbrook Psychiatric Group
Mental Health Education

Psychiatrist or Therapist — Which One Do You Actually Need?

Both help with mental health, but in very different ways. Here's how to know which provider is right for your situation — or whether you might benefit from both.

By Dr. Farrah Laviolette, MD · Cranbrook Psychiatric Group · 5 min read

When people are struggling with their mental health, one of the first questions they ask is: "Should I see a psychiatrist or a therapist?" It's a great question — and the honest answer is that it depends on what you're experiencing. Understanding the difference can save you time, money, and help you get the right care faster.

The core difference

The simplest way to think about it: psychiatrists are medical doctors who can prescribe medication and diagnose mental health conditions. Therapists are licensed counselors who help you work through thoughts, feelings, and behaviors using talk-based approaches. Both are mental health professionals, but they're trained differently and serve different — often overlapping — roles.

Therapist / Counselor
Talk-Based Therapy
  • Licensed counselor (LCSW, LPC, MFT, PhD)
  • Cannot prescribe medication
  • Uses CBT, DBT, EMDR, and other methods
  • Focuses on patterns, coping, relationships
  • Longer, regular sessions (50–60 min)
  • Ideal for processing life challenges

Signs you should see a psychiatrist

A psychiatrist is typically the right first step when symptoms are significantly interfering with daily life — school, work, relationships, or basic functioning — or when a medical evaluation is needed to understand what's going on.

  • P You've tried therapy but aren't improving — medication may be part of the picture
  • P You're experiencing severe depression, mania, psychosis, or suicidal thoughts
  • P Your child or teen is struggling in school, at home, or socially and needs a full evaluation
  • P You suspect ADHD and need a formal diagnosis and/or medication management
  • P Anxiety or panic attacks are happening frequently and feel out of control
  • P You need documentation for school accommodations, work leave, or court proceedings

Signs you should see a therapist

A therapist is often the best fit when you want to understand yourself better, process life events, or build coping skills — and your symptoms are manageable without medication.

  • T You're dealing with grief, a major life transition, or relationship difficulties
  • T You want to understand and change unhelpful patterns of thinking or behavior
  • T Mild-to-moderate anxiety or depression that isn't disrupting daily functioning
  • T You want to process trauma in a structured, safe environment
  • T You feel "stuck" and want guidance working through a difficult season of life
Can you see both at the same time? Absolutely — and for many people, this is the most effective approach. Research consistently shows that a combination of medication and therapy produces better outcomes than either alone for conditions like depression, anxiety, ADHD, and bipolar disorder. At Cranbrook Psychiatric Group, we actively collaborate with your therapist to make sure your care is coordinated.

A note for parents

If you're concerned about a child or teenager, a child and adolescent psychiatrist is often the right starting point. They can conduct a thorough evaluation that looks at the full picture — family history, school performance, developmental factors, and symptoms — before making any recommendations. Starting with a comprehensive evaluation avoids the guesswork and gets your child to the right care faster.

When in doubt, start with an evaluation

If you're unsure which direction to go, a psychiatric evaluation is a good first step. It gives you a clear diagnosis (or rules things out), and a qualified psychiatrist can then point you toward the right combination of medication, therapy, or both. You don't have to figure it out alone.

Ready to get clarity on what kind of support would help most? Dr. Farrah offers comprehensive virtual evaluations for children, teens, and adults — from the comfort of home.

Request an Appointment →

This article is for educational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. If you are experiencing a mental health emergency, please call 988 (Suicide & Crisis Lifeline) or go to your nearest emergency room.

Read More